search for: realtionships

Since I upgraded to 1.1, I am getting ''ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord'' exceptions when trying to save a specific record. I read up on ActiveRecord::Base.readonly? but I don''t think the condition there (objects pulled in from a certain JOIN type) applies. Here''s my code that is throwing the exception: @company = session[:company] @company.bytes_used =

For example I have table Questions. With fields id, text, and test_id. test_id is not being displayed in my view. I am hoping this means Rails has picked up that it is an id for another model. If so, then how do I utilize that? If not, then do I need to avoid ''id'' in any field names other than the main id field? Thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...omponents which may biological sense and the residuals are reasonable small. Now the problem. I don't have a big enough sample to run traditional PCA. I have about 40 dogs and 60 questions so which ever way you look at it not enough. There is past data available on some of the questions and the realtionships between them so I was wondering whether Bayesian PCA would be a useful alternative using past research to inform my priors. I wondered if anyone knew whether Bayesian PCA was better suited to smaller datasets than traditional (ML) PCA? If not I wondered if anyone knew of packages in R that could do...

Hello R People: When using the arima function with the seasonal option, are the seasonal options only good for monthly and quarterly data, please? Also, I believe that weekly and daily data are not appropriate for seasonal parm estimation via arima. Is that correct, please? Thanks, Sincerely, Laura Holt mailto: lauraholt_983 at hotmail.com download!

On Apr 28, 2008, at 17:32, Hendrik Boom wrote: > In http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html, when taking about writing a compiler > that uses LLVM (at least I think that's what the FAQ question is > asking), > the FAQ recommends > >> # Call into the LLVM libraries code using your language's FFI >> (foreign >> function interface). >> >> * for:

In http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html, when taking about writing a compiler that uses LLVM (at least I think that's what the FAQ question is asking), the FAQ recommends > # Call into the LLVM libraries code using your language's FFI (foreign > function interface). > > * for: best tracks changes to the LLVM IR, .ll syntax, and .bc > format > * for:

R-Listers. The following is a rant originally sent privately to Frank Harrell in response to remarks he made on this list. The ideas are not new or original, but he suggested I share it with the list, as he felt that it might be of wider interest, nonetheless. I have real doubts about this, and I apologize in advance to those who agree that I should have kept my remarks private. In view of this,

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:54:31 -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On Apr 28, 2008, at 17:32, Hendrik Boom wrote: > >> In http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html, when taking about writing a compiler >> that uses LLVM (at least I think that's what the FAQ question is >> asking), >> the FAQ recommends >> >>> # Call into the LLVM libraries code using your