search for: realllly

> It won't cause a negative effect, go for it! Dynamic_cast is realllly slow compared to dyn_cast, it is worth the memory. Ok, here's the first batch. It converts the RecTy hierarchy over to use LLVM-style RTTI. Along the way, I also wrote up a new doc "How to set up LLVM-style RTTI for your class hierarchy", which covers the previously undocumented (alb...

It won't cause a negative effect, go for it! Dynamic_cast is realllly slow compared to dyn_cast, it is worth the memory. -Chris On Oct 3, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback! > >>> Does anybody have anything else they think should go into TGContext or >>> any other responsibilities it...

On Oct 4, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> It won't cause a negative effect, go for it! Dynamic_cast is realllly slow compared to dyn_cast, it is worth the memory. > > Ok, here's the first batch. It converts the RecTy hierarchy over to > use LLVM-style RTTI. Along the way, I also wrote up a new doc "How to > set up LLVM-style RTTI for your class hierarchy", which covers the > pre...

Thanks for the feedback! >> Does anybody have anything else they think should go into TGContext or >> any other responsibilities it should have? Or any feedback about the >> idea in general? > > All memory allocations should go into its bump pointer, RecordKeeper should as well. Any other global state that exist should also. Sounds good. >> I'm also hoping

...st some patches on llvm-commits. -- Sean Silva On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Oct 4, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > >>> It won't cause a negative effect, go for it! Dynamic_cast is realllly slow compared to dyn_cast, it is worth the memory. >> >> Ok, here's the first batch. It converts the RecTy hierarchy over to >> use LLVM-style RTTI. Along the way, I also wrote up a new doc "How to >> set up LLVM-style RTTI for your class hierarchy", which cove...

I need them so I can build stuff using clang or clang-cl with its C++ standard libraries. To make sure that lld-link won't give errors about missing symbols from any standard libraries. By the way, you wouldn't happen to know how to use link.exe, would you? I might need some help on that to understand how to use lld-link.exe. ________________________________ From: Zachary Turner