search for: realiability

Hi, some question about the configuration behaviour of openssh.. sshd.8 -f configuration_file Specifies the name of the configuration file. The default is /etc/sshd_config. sshd refuses to start if there is no configura- tion file. While servconf.c has the routine fill_default_server_options(ServerOptions *options) which sets valid/common options by

On Friday 20 February 2004 00:09, Renaud Waldura shaped the electrons to shout: > 1- this is such a stoopid question I should be ashamed of myself -- > RTFM > > 2- this is a well-known issue that everybody's aware of, it doesn't > need further discussion thank you, as it is actively being worked on > > 3- it is meant to be that way and will not change. No, if you

Looks like maildir can't be used very realiably without quite a lot of locking. Writing and scanning the directory would have to be locked, but reading wouldn't (as long as the file hasn't been renamed which would require scanning to find it). So much for "no locks needed".. The problem is that opendir()/readdir() may temporarily not return some files if there has been

Hi all, If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could you share you general impression on it? Was it realiable? Fast? Any issues or concerns? Also, how feasible is it to start it on just one machine and then grow it out if necessary? Thanks. Boris.

> |No, if you search old archives (almost two years ago, > |http://breu.bulma.net/?l2480) you will see I've sent patches for server > |buffering (fast start) and other things that were never included. > | > |You can check the difference with http://mcrg.uib.es:8000/live.ogg which > |run my code realiable for more than a year now. > | > |The server also had a remote DoS

Hi All, I''m looking for a quality scaffolding plugin. So far I''ve discovered DryScaffolding and Streamlined. DryScaffolding doesn''t truly support Rails 1.2.2 so I dropped that. Streamlined works, but is full of quirks (e.g. many-to-many relationships not cascade updating correctly, etc). Can anyone suggest a quality scaffolding plugin/ generator/framework that

Recently i changed my old 6600GT with a less old HD4850, uninstalled the nvidia drivers and install the propietary catalyst last version. All run perfectly, glxinfo shows direct rendering yes and the corresponding bunch of extensions and glxgears rate clear high. But when i try to run any 3D app through wine it fails with for example: $ wine Oblivion.exe fixme:mixer:ALSA_MixerInit No master

I just get started with it so my question maybe not well catch. Anyway to do the VOIP call and IM we need to use two difference servers? which one is asterisk for VOIP ? and other one for IM that is openfire ? or we can have other choice better than this ? Thank you for your help, I am waiting for your reply. Thyda On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Kristof Van Den Ouweland < kvandenouweland

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ricardo Galli wrote: |On Friday 20 February 2004 00:09, Renaud Waldura shaped the electrons to |shout: | |>1- this is such a stoopid question I should be ashamed of myself -- |>RTFM |> |>2- this is a well-known issue that everybody's aware of, it doesn't |>need further discussion thank you, as it is actively being worked on

I haven't learned a lot about DKIM yet, but I guess I'll need to implement it in the near future, at first for signing outgoing mail. I'm using exim as an MTA. I guess the standard exim 4.63 binary rpm from CentOS repos propably does not have DKIM support yet? Or does it, maybe? Provided the standard binary rpm does not provide this functionality, what would be the most decent

Hi, I have a linux (redhat 6.0) print server and I am running samba 2.0.3-8 serving win95 machines. I would like the print server to send a message to the win95 when a print job is completed. To do that, I run winpopup on win95. However, if win95 users close winpopup, they do not receive any message. Is there any more realiable method to communicate with win95 machines? I would appreciate any

On Friday 20 February 2004 01:50, Michael Smith shaped the electrons to shout: > > |No, if you search old archives (almost two years ago, > > |http://breu.bulma.net/?l2480) you will see I've sent patches for > > | server buffering (fast start) and other things that were never > > | included. > > | > > |You can check the difference with

...on compare to, say, using a full file transfer or copy? In the latter case, you might be tempted to think there is zero probablity of file corruption, but if you think of any data transfer as sending a digital signal through a noisy communication channel, there must be some way to quantify the realiability of cp verses rsync. I'm not sure that I have all the skills to do this analysis, but I'd be interested in seeing it done. Regards, Berend Tober

Actually, I am using the openfire and I create two users with the SIP mapping on the openfire to the asterisk server. I can register one user with the openfire client(Spark) and yes it is connect to asterisk SIP also. But with the other one user, I register it with the SIP client(Zoiper/ or Linphone) and then I can make the call over these two SIP but they cannot reach the chat. I wonder what

Configuration ------------- There could be global and user-specific configuration files, similar to how ACLs work. I think the global virtual mailboxes should be only defaults though, so that users could delete them and create a new mailbox (virtual or non-virtual) with the same name. The global virtual mailboxes could be described in a single file, such as: Trash deleted Work/My Unseen

Any reason why portaudit and its associated infrastructure was not announced to this list or security-notifications? I recently discovered it, and discovered the feature was added to bsd.port.mk in the beginning of feburary. Seeing as the security officer apparently (without announcement) no longer issues security notices (SNs) for ports, I am assuming that portaudit has replaced SNs entirely,

There appears no source buffering in Icecast 2.0. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- my C skills are a bit rusty -- it looks like apart from a tiny 4K buffer, there is no buffering done when relaying a source. Is this an explicit design decision? The Internet being what it is, unreliable and all, it seems harsh to drop a source that's even slightly lagging, when a bit of buffering could

Hi! I fear this may be slightly off-topic but it's both related to IMAP and to dovecot: Is there any good and in paticular realiable program for synching / migrating one IMAP mailbox to another? The most important features for me is that a) no mails are lost / left out silently and b) the porgram is able to sync the complete mailbox including all folders without just giving up in the

We have an interesting quandry here. When I'm rsync'ing my directory tree (100 directories each containing 1000 files) I see some strange results: All of these machines are on their own network segment (100t) in our QA lab Solaris->Solaris - time taken: 11m32s Solaris->RH Linux 7.2 - time taken: 206s RH Linux->Rn Linux - time taken 1m59s In each instance I have rsync running

Hi All.. Am working on continous backup of mailboxes using rsync(for e.g by running rsync every 2 min) Things gets more complicated when users create Subfolders in INBOX , SENT , etc.. If anyone among you did that plz guide & advise. Thanks CoolAtt _________________________________________________________________ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.