search for: readthese

...be displayed on the > > > Group Policy wiki page. If there areother GPO policies that can > > > not be set with RSAT, those should alsobelisted. > > Thanks Peter for reaching out on this, > > So, the challenge is that in the past, Samba didn't know how to > > readthese, and the settings were just ignored. > > Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which > > settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the GPO? > > That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" needs to be > > setto Yes if the...

...on the >>>> Group Policy wiki page. If there areother GPO policies that can >>>> not be set with RSAT, those should alsobelisted. >>> Thanks Peter for reaching out on this, >>> So, the challenge is that in the past, Samba didn't know how to >>> readthese, and the settings were just ignored. >>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which >>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the GPO? >>> That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" needs to be >>> setto...

...gt; Group Policy wiki page. If there areother GPO policies that can > >>>> not be set with RSAT, those should alsobelisted. > >>> Thanks Peter for reaching out on this, > >>> So, the challenge is that in the past, Samba didn't know how to > >>> readthese, and the settings were just ignored. > >>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which > >>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the GPO? > >>> That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" needs to > &...

...licy wiki page. If there areother GPO policies that can >>>>>> not be set with RSAT, those should alsobelisted. >>>>> Thanks Peter for reaching out on this, >>>>> So, the challenge is that in the past, Samba didn't know how to >>>>> readthese, and the settings were just ignored. >>>>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which >>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the GPO? >>>>> That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" needs...

...;>>>> policies that can not be set with RSAT, those should > >>>>>> alsobelisted. > >>>>> Thanks Peter for reaching out on this, > >>>>> So, the challenge is that in the past, Samba didn't know how to > >>>>> readthese, and the settings were just ignored. > >>>>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which > >>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the > >>>>> GPO? That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group polici...

...;> policies that can not be set with RSAT, those should >>>>>>>> alsobelisted. >>>>>>> Thanks Peter for reaching out on this, >>>>>>> So, the challenge is that in the past, Samba didn't know how to >>>>>>> readthese, and the settings were just ignored. >>>>>>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which >>>>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the >>>>>>> GPO? That is why the smb.conf setting "apply gro...

On 27.08.2023 23:45, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2023-08-26 at 11:49 +0200, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I just wonder why it is not possible to set domain password policies >> with GPO, using the Windows RSAT Group Policy Manager? For most >> other >> settings, using GPOs through RSAT works. >> >> For somebody who sets

...can not be set > >>>>>>>> with RSAT, those should alsobelisted. > >>>>>>> Thanks Peter for reaching out on this, > >>>>>>> So, the challenge is that in the past, Samba didn't know how > >>>>>>> to readthese, and the settings were just ignored. > >>>>>>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which > >>>>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the > >>>>>>> GPO? That is why the smb.conf setting...

...et >>>>>>>>>> with RSAT, those should alsobelisted. >>>>>>>>> Thanks Peter for reaching out on this, >>>>>>>>> So, the challenge is that in the past, Samba didn't know how >>>>>>>>> to readthese, and the settings were just ignored. >>>>>>>>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which >>>>>>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the >>>>>>>>> GPO? That is why the smb.conf...