search for: readons

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4245 matches for "readons".

Did you mean: readon
2018 Jan 29
1
Panic: data stack: Out of memory when allocating bytes
Any idea what the problem could be? Is there anything more i could do to encircle the problem? Or perhaps is the information i provided uncomplete? Am 25.01.2018 um 16:24 schrieb Thomas Robers: > Hi, > > Am 24.01.2018 um 23:39 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek: >> It looks like the binaries are stripped.? There should be a "debug" >> package >> you can
2018 Jan 24
2
Panic: data stack: Out of memory when allocating bytes
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 18:55:47 +0100, Thomas Robers wrote: > Am 23.01.2018 um 20:07 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 14:03:27 -0500, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 18:21:38 +0100, Thomas Robers wrote: ... > > > 1. Do you have any idea what the imap process was doing at the time of the > > >
2007 Nov 23
3
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of the DoesntAccessMemoryFns and OnlyReadsMemoryFns tables
The DoesntAccessMemoryFns and OnlyReadsMemoryFns tables are used by alias analysis to specify which standard functions don't access memory or only read memory. However gcc now automatically supplies this information to us. I checked on my x86 linux box what gcc gives for the functions listed in those tables. While gcc mostly agrees with them, there are the following differences (using
2018 Jan 25
0
Panic: data stack: Out of memory when allocating bytes
Hi, Am 24.01.2018 um 23:39 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek: > It looks like the binaries are stripped. There should be a "debug" package > you can install with symbol information. Then, the backtrace should be much > more helpful. I installed the debug package and the backtrace now is: --- snip --- (gdb) bt full #0 0x00007f73f1386495 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No
2005 Dec 21
3
Checkbox readonly
I declare some checkboxes : <%= check_box_tag ''offers[]'', offer.id , @params[:offers].include?(offer.id.to_s) ,:readonly=>true %> the result is : <input checked="checked" id="offers[]" name="offers[]" readonly="readonly" type="checkbox" value="1" /> But readonly doesn''t work ??? -- Posted
2019 Aug 30
0
[nbdkit PATCH v2 2/2] server: Remember .open(readonly) status
The previous patch argued that globally affecting .can_write based on '-r' (the global 'readonly') prevents the ability for a filter to call next_open(nxdata, true) to purposefully write to the plugin, even while advertising .can_write=0 to the client. But it also demonstrated that when a filter passes false to next_open, we were still making needless probes into the plugin, for
2020 Jul 21
4
[PATCH nbdkit] server: Pass the export name through filter .open calls.
To allow filters to modify the export name as it passes through the layers this commit makes several changes: The filter .open callback now takes an extra parameter, the export name. This is always non-NULL (for oldstyle it is ""). This string has a short lifetime and filters that need to hang on to it must take a copy. The filter must pass the exportname parameter down to the next
2020 Aug 07
0
[nbdkit PATCH 1/3] server: Implement nbdkit_is_tls for use during .open
Now that we can differentiate content based on export name, we also need to be able to differentiate content for a --tls=on server, since TLS is optional according to whether the client has authenticated. For internal code and filters, this means adding a new parameter; the sh plugin can do likewise. For plugins, we can't add a parameter until the V3 protocol, so in the meantime, we add
2020 Aug 25
0
[nbdkit PATCH 1/5] api: Add .default_export
I'm about to add an 'exportname' filter, and in the process, I noticed a few shortcomings in our API. Time to fix those before the 1.22 release locks our API in stone. Overloading .list_exports in order to determine a canonical export name at .open time is awkward; the two uses (answering NBD_OPT_LIST for a full list, vs. remapping a client's "" into a canonical name
2018 Apr 25
2
Help on understanding assume shape array processing and array descriptors in LLVM IR
Hi, I am trying to understand how assume shaped arrays are received and processed in LLVM IR. I am using "flang" for my front end. There seems to be an array descriptor received as implicit argument for every assume shaped array. For my test routine: ---snip-- SUBROUTINE test(a,b,Li,Lj,Istr,Iend,Jstr,Jend) INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: Li,Lj INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: Istr, Iend,
2020 Feb 19
1
[PATCH] ruby: change value of 'readonly' drive toption to Boolean in doc/example/test
Seeing `g.add_drive_opt :readonly => 1` allows one to imply that ensuring writable access to drive should happen via `g.add_drive_opt :readonly => 0`. However, the passed option value gets passed down to C according to Ruby Boolean semantics, that is, any value apart from `false` and `nil` will be true (see RTEST in Ruby C API). So its more idiomatic and provides a better hint if we use
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] A limitation of LLVM with regard to marking sret functions as readonly.
On 08/03/2015 18:07, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Nicholas Chapman > <admin at indigorenderer.com <mailto:admin at indigorenderer.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > I have identified what seems to be a limitation of LLVM with > regard to marking 'sret functions' as pure/readonly. > > For some context - I have
2015 Aug 01
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Clang devirtualization proposal
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > I'm wondering if there's a problematic interaction with CSE here. > Consider this example is pseudo LLVM IR: > v1 = load i64, %p, !invariant.group !Type1 > ; I called destructor/placement new for the same type, but that optimized > entirely away > p2 =
2015 Mar 08
2
[LLVMdev] A limitation of LLVM with regard to marking sret functions as readonly.
Hi all, I have identified what seems to be a limitation of LLVM with regard to marking 'sret functions' as pure/readonly. For some context - I have some JITed code produced by LLVM, and that code calls back into the host application occasionally. Since my language is purely functional, no functions have side-effects. Therefore I would like to be able to cache the value of identical
2007 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] memory hog llvm-ld
Hi Holger, > Note that I did specify "-g", but not any "-Ox" switches. That > made the size of all *.o files together being 143 MB. LLVM represents debug info as explicit calls to intrinsics. This approach has many advantages, but a possible disadvantage is that it can significantly increase the size of the bitcode. I don't know if that explains your observations.
2011 May 26
5
[PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: bugfix for hard readonly mount
Hi, All, These four patches are all related to ocfs2 on hard readonly mount. patch 1 fix oops when umount ocfs2 on hard readonly device. Because ocfs2_dismount_volume() will call ocfs2_cluster_hangup() and then call ocfs2_stack_driver_put(), will hit BUG_ON(active_stack == NULL). patch 2 fix oops when do ls or cat in ocfs2 on hard readonly device. Because ocfs2_open_lock() will call
2015 Apr 20
2
Mounting directory as readonly within LXC
Hello Is there a way to mount a directory as readonly when using LXC with libvirt? Something like: <filesystem type="mount"> <source dir="/sw/py27/python2.7_x86_64"/> <target dir="/opt//py27"/> <readonly/> </filesystem> The documentation says
2010 Jan 13
1
Running Asterisk & Freepbx on readonly Root (Stateless System)
Hi I am trying to Run AsteriskNow 1.5 which uses Centos 5.3 Distribution with Readonly Root Filesytem. Right now if I shutdown the system abrupty or there is power failure linux kernel doesn't not boot "Kernel panic" and other short of issues.prb due to corrupted files. Thats why i want to make root filesystem as read-only and placing some directories /var and /etc/asterisk etc as
2014 Mar 12
3
Re: [PATCH v2 03/18] New API parameter: Add discard parameter to guestfs_add_drive_opts.
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 23:13:46 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > diff --git a/src/drives.c b/src/drives.c > index 2c85b52..68e37f7 100644 > --- a/src/drives.c > +++ b/src/drives.c > @@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ static struct drive * > create_drive_file (guestfs_h *g, const char *path, > bool readonly, const char *format, > const char *iface,
2017 Jan 03
4
RFC: Allow readnone and readonly functions to throw exceptions
LLVM today does not clearly specify if a function specified to not write to memory (i.e. readonly or readnone) is allowed to throw exceptions. LangRef is ambiguous on this issue. The normative statement is "[readnone/readonly functions] cannot unwind exceptions by calling the C++ exception throwing methods" which does not decide an answer for non C++ languages. It used to say (h/t