Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "readbatch".
Did you mean:
read_batch
2006 Mar 07
7
reading in only one column from text file
How do I manipulate the read.table function to read in only the 2nd
column???
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2002 May 04
1
A simpler move-files patch
...+extern int move_files;
/**
@@ -184,6 +185,7 @@
rprintf(FERROR,"send_files failed to open %s: %s\n",
fname,strerror(errno));
free_sums(s);
+ file->flags |= FLAG_NO_DELETE;
continue;
}
@@ -265,6 +267,7 @@
rprintf (FINFO,"readbatch & checksums don't match\n");
rprintf (FINFO,"filename=%s is being skipped\n",
fname);
+ file->flags |= FLAG_NO_DELETE;
continue;
}
} else {
@@ -281,6 +284,28 @@
if...
2003 Jul 24
0
(no subject)
...+ for (n = 0; n < flist->count; n++ ) {
+ send_file_entry(flist->files[n], f, 0);
+ }
+ send_file_entry(NULL, f, 0);
+ if (f != -1 && remote_version >= 15) {
+ send_uid_list(f);
+ }
+ if (f != -1 && remote_version >= 17 && !read_batch) { /* dw-added
readbatch */
+ extern int module_id;
+ write_int(f, lp_ignore_errors(module_id) ? 0 : io_error);
+ }
+ }
struct file_list *recv_file_list(int f)
{
diff -E -B -c -r rsync-2.5.6/main.c rsync-2.5.6-remotebatch/main.c
*** rsync-2.5.6/main.c Tue Jan 28 05:05:53 2003
--- rsync-2.5.6-remotebatch/main.c...
2002 Sep 12
2
computation on the client instead of the server
Hello,
I read the thesis about rsync and I would like to know if we can do
something different with rsync.
Imagine that I have one server that contains a set of data. This server
is not very strong compare to the number of client that want to sync
there data with the server. If we say that there s 1000 clients, each
client, when sync, will send a list of keys to the server and the server
must
2001 Aug 06
1
merge rsync+ into rsync (was Re: rsync-2.4.7 NEWS file)
> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch?
Thanks for the reminder.
I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the
"branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody
screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or
Wednesday.
I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the
man page, so we should fix that in the future.
2006 Mar 08
0
survival
...a frame. Try that first.
Perhaps there is a nicer way to do this that I don't know about, but
recently I coded up the following to allow for a "streamy" read.table.
I've adjusted a few things, but haven't tested. May not work as is,
but it should give you an idea.
+ seth
readBatch <- function(con, batch.size) {
colClasses <- rep("character", 20) ## fix for your data
## adjust to pick out the columns that you want
read.csv(con, colClasses=colClasses, as.is=TRUE,
nrows=batch.size, header=FALSE)[, 1:2]
}
readTableStreamily <- functio...