Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "read_pac".
Did you mean:
read_pmc
2009 Jun 08
2
about nut revision 1289
...)
Can you please clarify the change introduced by the subj
(http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/changeset/1289)? I need to know in
particular why did you add these intervals between sending a command
and reading the response. They are the root of weird problems with
megatec_usb. Can I safely remove READ_PACE and usleep-s?
I tried to search the archives and found the related thread:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2008-February/003724.html
Unfortunately it doesn't answer my question.
--
Alexander
2010 Mar 16
1
NUT megatec driver tunning
...cess the results of my work.
>
>
> My UPS ?Sinapse MSII6000? used megatec protocol on COM-port.
> http://sinapse.ua/product/ups_sinapse/Sinapse/Sinapse_9103?cs_lang=ru
> After some tunning it working with NUT.
> ________________________________________
>
> Value:
> ? ? ? ?READ_PACE ? ?300000 ?/* interval to wait between sending a command
> and reading the response (usec) */
> to small for me and driver work not perfectly with my ups (frequently Q1 =>
> FAILED [short read] or other error)
>
> Especially is clearly seen in Check sub-procedure: ? ? ?/* Check f...