search for: read_mask

...lcn_acr_desc { + union { + u8 reserved_dmem[0x200]; + u32 signatures[4]; + } ucode_reserved_space; + u32 wpr_region_id; + u32 wpr_offset; + u32 mmu_mem_range; +#define FLCN_ACR_MAX_REGIONS 2 + struct { + u32 no_regions; + struct { + u32 start_addr; + u32 end_addr; + u32 region_id; + u32 read_mask; + u32 write_mask; + u32 client_mask; + } region_props[FLCN_ACR_MAX_REGIONS]; + } regions; + u32 ucode_blob_size; + u64 ucode_blob_base __aligned(8); + struct { + u32 vpr_enabled; + u32 vpr_start; + u32 vpr_end; + u32 hdcp_policies; + } vpr_desc; +}; + +static void +gm200_secboot_fixup_hs_...

Sending things in a smaller chunks since it makes their reviewing easier. This part part 2/3 of the secboot refactoring/PMU command support patch series. Part 1 was the new falcon library which should be merged soon now. This series is mainly a refactoring/sanitization of the existing secure boot code. It does not add new features (part 3 will). Secure boot handling is now separated by NVIDIA

Hi everyone, Apologies for the big patchset. This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the

...lcn_acr_desc { + union { + u8 reserved_dmem[0x200]; + u32 signatures[4]; + } ucode_reserved_space; + u32 wpr_region_id; + u32 wpr_offset; + u32 mmu_mem_range; +#define FLCN_ACR_MAX_REGIONS 2 + struct { + u32 no_regions; + struct { + u32 start_addr; + u32 end_addr; + u32 region_id; + u32 read_mask; + u32 write_mask; + u32 client_mask; + } region_props[FLCN_ACR_MAX_REGIONS]; + } regions; + u32 ucode_blob_size; + u64 ucode_blob_base __aligned(8); + struct { + u32 vpr_enabled; + u32 vpr_start; + u32 vpr_end; + u32 hdcp_policies; + } vpr_desc; +}; + +/** + * Contains the whole secure bo...

This revision includes initial signed PMU firmware support for GM20B (Tegra X1). This PMU code will also be used as a basis for dGPU signed PMU firmware support. With the PMU code, the refactoring of secure boot should also make more sense. ACR (secure boot) support is now separated by the driver version it originates from. This separation allows to run any version of the ACR on any chip,

This is a highly changed revision of the first patch series that adds secure boot support to Nouveau. This code still depends on NVIDIA releasing official firmware files, but the files released with SHIELD TV and Pixel C can already be used on a Jetson TX1. As you know we are working hard to release the official firmware files, however in the meantime it doesn't hurt to review the code so it

New version of the secure boot code that works with the blobs just merged into linux-firmware. Since the required Mesa patches are also merged, this set is the last piece of the puzzle to get out-of-the-box accelerated Maxwell 2. The basic code remains the same, with a few improvements with respect to how secure falcons are started. Hopefully the patchset is better split too. I have a