Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "reachone".
Did you mean:
reaching
2008 May 07
3
Yum + priorities plugin question
...know it results in double the internet
traffic for the repo mirror, which is less than friendly.
Does anyone know if there's a more elegant way to deal with this issue,
or might this be an appropriate feature request for the plugin developer?
Sincerely,
Jacob Leaver
Sr. System Administrator
ReachONE Internet
2005 Apr 28
1
Maia Mailguard
OK sever hours of grepping through the output of "yum list available,"
google, checking rpmfind, Dag, Fedore Extras, etc., and there doesn't
seem to be a RPM for Maia Mailguard.
If there is one please point me in the right direction and beat me
over the head with the correct way to find RPMs in the future.
Maybe I just need sleep...
2005 Mar 25
0
Fw: Sendmail vs. Postfix
...features to me were the
ability for users to control their own settings, and review their own
quarantine. Maia''s based on amavisd-new, and as such can use both
SpamAssassin, and DSPAM, as well as pyzor, razor, and dcc to aide in
determining spam.
Jacob Leaver
Senior Systems Administrator
ReachONE Internet
2003 Nov 28
0
Asterisck as a Fujistu 9600 VOIP Gateway
...ng system in place, and I have a mini
gateway functioning using a devel kit from digium. I am a systems admin,
and know near nothing about the Fujitsu, and could really use some "newbie"
help, if anyone's got such a system running.
Many Thanks,
Jacob Leaver
Senior Systems Engineer
ReachONE Internet
2007 Mar 06
1
PowerDNS binaries on centosplus?
Hi everyone,
How does one go about putting a request for getting a package included
in centosplus? We are heavy users the product PowerDNS and are keen to
see that be included in the centosplus repository, so it can be
compiled against other recent packages like MySQL5 etc.
Any pointers will be helpful
--
"I never look back darling, it distracts from the now", Edna Mode (The
2008 May 15
1
Using Nagios in CentOS (It was Re: Somewhat OT: (Nagios))
2008/5/14 Thomas Harold <tgh at tgharold.com>:
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>>
>> 2008/5/13 <jleaver+centos at reachone.com>:
>>
>> OK, you won :) I'm going to test nagios. I am using centos 5.1
>> x86_64. Do I lose much if I use rpm from rpmforge (version 2.9)?
>>
>
> We're running version 2.11 at the office (on CentOS 5.1 x86_64). I've
> looked at some of the thing...
2005 Mar 25
27
Sendmail vs. Postfix
Hah!!! This list is just too calm and mundane. The only thing we argue
about is the ''announce'' list vs. the ''user'' list. ;) So, it''s
springtime! I''m seeing all the regularly scheduled ''oil'' threads on my
motorcycle lists and thought "oh what the heck, lets get the ''oil''
thread going over on the CentOS
2009 Mar 16
0
[Bridge] STP FD when STP is disabled
It appears that interfaces participate in STP's forwarding delay even when STP is disabled for a given bridge. I can remedy by setting the FD to 0 for each new bridge, but I'm wondering if this is by design or oversight.
[root@ ~]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0.690 8000.00065b8bce3e no eth1.690