Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "reaaalli".
Did you mean:
reaaally
2008 Sep 21
0
Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence, with multiple factors
>Ben Bolker <bolker <at> ufl.edu> writes:
>
>I would try
>
>fligner.test(dT ~ Topology:Drift:lambda)
>
>in response to:
>
>Javier Acuna <javier.acuna.o <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so
> please bear with me if this is a silly question.
>
> I'm trying to assess
2019 Oct 01
2
Adding support for vscale
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:08 AM Graham Hunter <Graham.Hunter at arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Luke,
hi graham, thanks for responding in such an informative fashion.
> > On 1 Oct 2019, at 09:21, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > typedef vec4 float[4]; // SEW=32,LMUL=4 probably
> > static vec4 globalvec[1024]; // vscale ==
2019 Oct 01
3
Adding support for vscale
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:08 AM Robin Kruppe <robin.kruppe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Jacob and Luke,
>
> First off, even if a dynamically changing vscale was truly necessary
> for RVV or SV, this thread would be far too late to raise the question.
> That vscale is constant -- that the number of elements in a scalable
> vector does not change during program execution
2008 Sep 22
1
R-help Digest, Vol 67, Issue 23
Warranty on Accuracy, Precision, Legality, ... of R in Research
(These questions may well have been raised.)
What is the implied warranty of using R for research & publications, consulting, etc.?
Alternately, how does one obtain such a warranty?
Your answers will be much appreciated.
Perhaps you can point me to some websites which discussed this subject in the past.
Thanks & regards