search for: re_openbsd_duid

...unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index ab76bc6..18be68b 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_netbsd_dev, "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static int check_hostname_unix (g...

...unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index c6fa23e..3a2f81a 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_netbsd_dev, "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static int check_hostname_unix (g...

...EXP (re_sles_patchlevel, "^PATCHLEVEL = (\\d+)", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_minix, "^(\\d+)\\.(\\d+)(\\.(\\d+))?", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static int check_hostname_unix (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); @@ -659,6 +662,55 @@ guestfs___check_ne...

...EXP (re_sles_patchlevel, "^PATCHLEVEL = (\\d+)", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_minix, "^(\\d+)\\.(\\d+)(\\.(\\d+))?", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static int check_hostname_unix (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); @@ -659,6 +662,55 @@ guestfs___check_ne...

...REOS, OS_DISTRO_ALPINE_LINUX, OS_DISTRO_ALTLINUX, + OS_DISTRO_FRUGALWARE, }; enum inspect_os_package_format { diff --git a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index abbae35..65ab8ef 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_netbsd_dev, "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_altlinux, " (?:(\\d+)(?:\\.(\\d+)(?:[\\.\\d]+)?)?)\\s+\\((?:[^)]+)\\)$", 0) +...

No change, just reposting without the "for discussion" tag. I think we should allow this as it seems like a nice coding style for a limited subset of imperative-style code. Rich.

When rewriting the heavily imperative original inspection code, I longed for a ‘return’ statement so I could keep the new code as close as possible to the original. OCaml of course does not have such a statement, but it's relatively simply to implement it in the language. The first patch does so, and the second patch rewrites a sample of the inspection code to use it. Rich.

...X, }; enum inspect_os_package_format { diff --git a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index abfa527..abbae35 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_netbsd_dev, "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_altlinux, " (?:(\\d+)(?:\\.(\\d+)(?:[\\.\\d]+)?)?)\\s+\\((?:[^)]+)\\)$", 0)...

...anslation is not straight forward. + */ + mountable = safe_strdup (g, fs->mountable); + else if (STRPREFIX (spec, "/dev/")) + /* Resolve guest block device names. */ + mountable = resolve_fstab_device (g, spec, md_map, fs->type); + else if (match (g, spec, re_openbsd_duid)) { + /* In OpenBSD's fstab you can specify partitions on a disk by appending a + * period and a partition letter to a Disklable Unique Identifier. The + * DUID is a 16 hex digit field found in the OpenBSD's altered BSD + * disklabel. For more info see here: + *...

Adds support for systemd .mount files, uses Augeas to extract mount points. Fixes RHBZ#1113153. Maros Zatko (1): inspection: add support for systemd .mount files src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 240 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 240 insertions(+) -- 1.9.3

...+)s(\\d+)([a-z])$" +let re_hurd_dev = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$" +let re_mdN = PCRE.compile "^/dev/md\\d+$" +let re_netbsd_dev = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$" +let re_openbsd_dev = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$" +let re_openbsd_duid = PCRE.compile "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]" +let re_xdev = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(h|s|v|xv)d([a-z]+)(\\d*)$" + +let rec check_fstab ?(mdadm_conf = false) (root_mountable : Mountable.t) + os_type = + let configfiles = + "/etc/fstab" :: if mdadm_conf then...

...ev = Str.regexp "^/dev/\\(h\\)d\\([0-9]+\\)s\\([0-9]+\\)$" +let re_mdN = Str.regexp "^/dev/md[0-9]+$" +let re_netbsd_dev = Str.regexp "^/dev/\\(l\\|s\\)d\\([0-9]\\)\\([a-z]\\)$" +let re_openbsd_dev = Str.regexp "^/dev/\\(s\\|w\\)d\\([0-9]\\)\\([a-z]\\)$" +let re_openbsd_duid = Str.regexp "^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\\.\\([a-z]\\)" +let re_xdev = Str.regexp "^/dev/\\(h\\|s\\|v\\|xv\\)d\\([a-z]+\\)\\([0-9]*\\)$" + +let rec check_fstab ?(mdadm_conf = f...

This is the (incomplete) patch which reimplements inspection APIs in the daemon. All ‘XXX’s in this patch indicate areas which are not yet implemented or need further work. Rich.

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.