search for: re_openbsd_dev

...nspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_netbsd_dev, "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static int check_hostname_unix (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); @@ -92,7 +93,8 @@ static int check...

...nspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_netbsd_dev, "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static int check_hostname_unix (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); @@ -92,7 +93,8 @@ static int check...

...EGEXP (re_minix, "^(\\d+)\\.(\\d+)(\\.(\\d+))?", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static int check_hostname_unix (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); @@ -659,6 +662,55 @@ guestfs___check_netbsd_root (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) return 0; } +/* T...

...EGEXP (re_minix, "^(\\d+)\\.(\\d+)(\\.(\\d+))?", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static int check_hostname_unix (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); @@ -659,6 +662,55 @@ guestfs___check_netbsd_root (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) return 0; } +/* T...

...GALWARE, }; enum inspect_os_package_format { diff --git a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index abbae35..65ab8ef 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_netbsd_dev, "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_altlinux, " (?:(\\d+)(?:\\.(\\d+)(?:[\\.\\d]+)?)?)\\s+\\((?:[^)]+)\\)$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_frugalware, "Frugalware (\\d+)\\.(\\d+)",...

...nix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index abfa527..abbae35 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd, "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_duid, "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_openbsd_dev, "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) COMPILE_REGEXP (re_netbsd_dev, "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$", 0) +COMPILE_REGEXP (re_altlinux, " (?:(\\d+)(?:\\.(\\d+)(?:[\\.\\d]+)?)?)\\s+\\((?:[^)]+)\\)$", 0) static void check_architecture (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs);...

...)$" +let re_freebsd_mbr = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(ada{0,1}|vtbd)(\\d+)s(\\d+)([a-z])$" +let re_hurd_dev = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$" +let re_mdN = PCRE.compile "^/dev/md\\d+$" +let re_netbsd_dev = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(l|s)d([0-9])([a-z])$" +let re_openbsd_dev = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(s|w)d([0-9])([a-z])$" +let re_openbsd_duid = PCRE.compile "^[0-9a-f]{16}\\.[a-z]" +let re_xdev = PCRE.compile "^/dev/(h|s|v|xv)d([a-z]+)(\\d*)$" + +let rec check_fstab ?(mdadm_conf = false) (root_mountable : Mountable.t) + os_t...

...t;^/dev/\\(ada{0,1}\\|vtbd\\)\\([0-9]+\\)s\\([0-9]+\\)\\([a-z]\\)$" +let re_hurd_dev = Str.regexp "^/dev/\\(h\\)d\\([0-9]+\\)s\\([0-9]+\\)$" +let re_mdN = Str.regexp "^/dev/md[0-9]+$" +let re_netbsd_dev = Str.regexp "^/dev/\\(l\\|s\\)d\\([0-9]\\)\\([a-z]\\)$" +let re_openbsd_dev = Str.regexp "^/dev/\\(s\\|w\\)d\\([0-9]\\)\\([a-z]\\)$" +let re_openbsd_duid = Str.regexp "^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\\.\\([a-z]\\)" +let re_xdev = Str.regexp "^/dev/\\(h...

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.

libguestfs has used double and triple underscores in identifiers. These aren't valid for global names in C++. (http://stackoverflow.com/a/228797) These large but completely mechanical patches change the illegal identifiers to legal ones. Rich.