search for: rdrop

...it to work in an known-good environment --- no matter how I specify the args to it, it's copying the file rather than linking --- the b.0/x/y/z file should have an inode of 7439904, and it's getting a new one: 7439910. Hopefully someone can point me at the error of my ways... <agora.rdrop.com> [150] $ lf -ilR total 4 7439897 drwxr-xr-x 3 alan staff 512 Dec 14 17:27 b.1/ 7437112 drwxr-xr-x 3 alan staff 512 Dec 14 17:26 x/ ./b.1: total 2 7439900 drwxr-xr-x 3 alan staff 512 Dec 14 17:26 x/ ./b.1/x: total 2 7439902 drwxr-xr-x 2 alan staff 512 Dec 14 17:26 y/ ./b.1/x/y:...

Maurice R Volaski via rsync <maurice.volaski at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh) > to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script > runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh > session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able > to connect again. Even restarting

.... */ + struct work_struct reset_work; + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ bool affinity_hint_set; @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, int i; for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&sq->stats.syncp);...

.... */ + struct work_struct reset_work; + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ bool affinity_hint_set; @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, int i; for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&sq->stats.syncp);...

...t struct virtnet_stat_desc virtnet_rq_stats_desc[] = { > > @@ -1721,7 +1723,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, > > int i; > > > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { > > - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; > > + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; > > struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; > > struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; > > > > @@ -1729,6 +1731,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_...

...be the case that the failure is taking place across time, and it doesn't fail wholesale immediately. However, I have other scripts like these copying from other sources (not Ubuntu) and they are not causing these failures. On 6/3/23, 12:40 AM, "Perry Hutchison" <pluto at agora.rdrop.com <mailto:pluto at agora.rdrop.com> <mailto:pluto at agora.rdrop.com <mailto:pluto at agora.rdrop.com>>> wrote: CAUTION: This email comes from an external source; the attachments and/or links may compromise our secure environment. Do not open or click on suspicious emails...

From: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco at gmail.com> Driver virtio_net is not handling error events for TX provided by dev_watchdog. This event is reached when transmission queue is having problems to transmit packets. To enable it, driver should have .ndo_tx_timeout implemented. This serie has two commits: In the past, we implemented a function to recover driver state when this kind of event

From: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco at gmail.com> Driver virtio_net is not handling error events for TX provided by dev_watchdog. This event is reached when transmission queue is having problems to transmit packets. To enable it, driver should have .ndo_tx_timeout implemented. This serie has two commits: In the past, we implemented a function to recover driver state when this kind of event

.... */ + struct work_struct reset_work; + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ bool affinity_hint_set; @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, int i; for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&sq->stats.syncp);...

.... */ + struct work_struct reset_work; + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ bool affinity_hint_set; @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, int i; for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&sq->stats.syncp);...

...> /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ > bool affinity_hint_set; > > @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { > - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; > + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; > struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; > struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; > > @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, > start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(...

Maurice R Volaski <maurice.volaski at einsteinmed.edu> wrote: > Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have > a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from > this computer. > > Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, > which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. > > I'm copying to a CIFS

Hello! A proposal (quaintly identified as P0190R0) for a new memory_order_consume definition may be found here: http://www2.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/submission/consume.2016.02.10b.pdf As requested at the October C++ Standards Committee meeting, this is a follow-on to P0098R1 that picks one alternative and describes it in detail. This approach focuses on existing practice, with the goal of supporting existing code with existi...

...kets; } static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq) @@ -1686,9 +1678,9 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, do { start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&rq->stats.syncp); - rpackets = rq->stats.items.packets; - rbytes = rq->stats.items.bytes; - rdrops = rq->stats.items.drops; + rpackets = rq->stats.packets; + rbytes = rq->stats.bytes; + rdrops = rq->stats.drops; } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&rq->stats.syncp, start)); tot->rx_packets += rpackets; @@ -2078,7 +2070,7 @@ static void virtnet_get_ethtoo...

Commit 5b8f3c8d30a6 ("virtio_net: Add XDP related stats") tries to count TX XDP stats in virtnet_receive(). This will cause several issues: - virtnet_xdp_sq() was called without checking whether or not XDP is set. This may cause out of bound access when there's no enough txq for XDP. - Stats were updated even if there's no XDP/XDP_TX. Fixing this by reusing

Commit 5b8f3c8d30a6 ("virtio_net: Add XDP related stats") tries to count TX XDP stats in virtnet_receive(). This will cause several issues: - virtnet_xdp_sq() was called without checking whether or not XDP is set. This may cause out of bound access when there's no enough txq for XDP. - Stats were updated even if there's no XDP/XDP_TX. Fixing this by reusing

Hi all [Exclamation] I decided to register because i cant solve the problem with a game and speaking program from the topic. When i run those 2 things separately they work very fine. But when i try to run them together World of Warcraft just freezes. Ventrilo still works fine, people can hear me and i can hear them. When i run WoW without Vent, it works really nice. Even voice chat in game

Rupert Gallagher via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 7 Aug 2020, 23:44, Wayne Davison < wayne at opencoder.net> wrote: > > >> Also, I have 12GB of cache in ecc ram that rsync is not using. > > >It uses whatever memory it needs plus whatever filesystem caching > >your OS provides. > > Hmmm... bad day today... > > No, it is not

Beach ball play is fun, but I see this ball bounched betwen rsync, openbsd and supermicro, and I am not enjoying it. I see a large cache delivered by the OS on server hardware and a program unable to use it. -------- Original Message -------- On 8 Aug 2020, 20:14, < pluto at agora.rdrop.com> wrote: Rupert Gallagher via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 7 Aug 2020, 23:44, Wayne Davison < wayne at opencoder.net> wrote: > > >> Also, I have 12GB of cache in ecc ram that rsync is not using. > > >It uses whatever memory it needs plus wha...

Rupert Gallagher <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: > ... I see this ball bounched betwen rsync, openbsd and supermicro > ... I see a large cache delivered by the OS on server hardware and > a program unable to use it. It sounds as if the problem may be OpenBSD "delivering" the cache rather than "utilizing" it. What does the documentation -- or the OpenBSD