search for: rdocument

On 8 September 2016 at 06:01, Jonathan Baron wrote: | We have over 10,000 packages now. I wonder if searching all help files | is really helpful anymore. Yes it is. I go to http://rdocumentation.org a lot for quick look-ups. So thanks to Datacamp for running that. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org

I looked at rdocumentation.org. At first I thought it was a superior replacement for namazu, but after I tried a few things I decided that it wasn't. I could not find any documentation about how to search, and the various things I tried seemed to yield very strange responses, e.g., a search for "Hayes mediation...

...l > probably have time to rebuild that one, but I may not have time to > rebuild finzi for another week. I will try to get it all done in one > day, but I don't know if I can. > > Sorry about this. > > I thought that there was an alternative to this site, namely > http://rdocumentation.org/ > but, as bad is my site is, that one, I think, is worse. > > Jon

...I will >probably have time to rebuild that one, but I may not have time to >rebuild finzi for another week. I will try to get it all done in one >day, but I don't know if I can. > >Sorry about this. > >I thought that there was an alternative to this site, namely >http://rdocumentation.org/ >but, as bad is my site is, that one, I think, is worse. > >Jon -- Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Home page: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron Editor: Judgment and Decision Making (http://journal.sjdm.org)

...many >years. I hope we can find a way to keep the system maintained. Failing >that, I could use help in adapting the sos package to another database. > > > Thanks, > Spencer Graves > > >-------- Forwarded Message -------- >Subject: Re: RSiteSearch, sos, rdocumentation.org, ...? >Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:15:22 -0400 >From: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu> >To: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> >CC: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu>, chris.is.fun at gmail.com, >info at datacamp.com <info...

...ined. Failing that, I could use help in > adapting the sos package to another database. > > > Thanks, > Spencer Graves > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: RSiteSearch, sos, rdocumentation.org > <http://rdocumentation.org>, ...? > Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:15:22 -0400 > From: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu > <mailto:baron at psych.upenn.edu>> > To: Spencer Graves <spe...

On 09/08/16 07:09, John Merrill wrote: >Given Google's commitment to R, I don't think that they'd be at all averse >to supporting a custom search box on the package page. It might well be a >good thing for "someone" to examine the API for setting up such a page and >to investigate how to mark the main CRAN page as searchable. The main CRAN page is not ideal. We

Would it make sense to recreate the "searchable R help pages" by feeding them all into elasticsearch, which will automatically index them and also provides an extensive (HTTP+JSON-based) API to perform complex searches? On 9/8/2016 10:31 AM, Jonathan Baron wrote: > On 09/08/16 07:09, John Merrill wrote: >> Given Google's commitment to R, I don't think that they'd

.... Failing >>>that, I could use help in adapting the sos package to another database. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Spencer Graves >>> >>> >>>-------- Forwarded Message -------- >>>Subject: Re: RSiteSearch, sos, rdocumentation.org, ...? >>>Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:15:22 -0400 >>>From: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu> >>>To: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> >>>CC: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu>, chris.is.fun at gmail.com, &g...

...ng the sos package to >>>> another database. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Spencer Graves >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: RSiteSearch, sos, rdocumentation.org, ...? >>>> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:15:22 -0400 >>>> From: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu> >>>> To: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> >>>> CC: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu>...

Hi, I just wanted to share with you that we made a website over the weekend that allows "instant search" of the R documentation on CRAN, see: www.Rdocumentation.org. It's a first version, so any feedback/comments/criticism most welcome. Best regards, Jonathan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...a great service for the R community for many years. I hope we can find a way to keep the system maintained. Failing that, I could use help in adapting the sos package to another database. Thanks, Spencer Graves -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: RSiteSearch, sos, rdocumentation.org, ...? Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:15:22 -0400 From: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu> To: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> CC: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu>, chris.is.fun at gmail.com, info at datacamp.com <info at datacamp.com>,...

...stion. The answer is that it actually is included, but there are many instances across packages where multiple functions are documented on a single help page. The following brings up such a page... (for XML_3.98-1.9) > library(XML) > ?newXMLNode You can see the same on line... https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/XML/versions/3.98-1.9/topics/newXMLDoc You have dig in to find it. If you are just starting out with XML, you might want to spend some time comparison shopping with the xml2 package. https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/xml2/versions/1.2.0 <https://www.rdocumentation.org...

...a way to keep the system maintained. Failing >>that, I could use help in adapting the sos package to another database. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Spencer Graves >> >> >>-------- Forwarded Message -------- >>Subject: Re: RSiteSearch, sos, rdocumentation.org, ...? >>Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:15:22 -0400 >>From: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu> >>To: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> >>CC: Jonathan Baron <baron at psych.upenn.edu>, chris.is.fun at gmail.com, >>info at da...

Big thanks. newXMLNode works great. Wonder why it is not included in the documentation. There is newXMLDoc and newXMLNamespace, but no mention of newXMLNode. Stephen From: Ben Tupper [mailto:btupper at bigelow.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 6:18 PM To: Bond, Stephen Cc: r-help Subject: Re: [R] how to add a child to a child in XML Hi, XML doesn't use the `$` to access child nodes.

Gracias, Jorge le echo un vistazo al link y te digo algo Un saludo Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:22:11 +0100 Subject: Re: [R-es] Pregunta sobre Simplificación de Poligonales con R From: jayusor en gmail.com To: fjroar en hotmail.com CC: r-help-es en r-project.org Hola, Esto lo hice algún tiempo para no hacer tan pesado los dibujos, si buscar por "R simplify shp" encuentras cosas, por

Vaya, polémica. ¿R puro es R base? Porque van ya por 6618 paquetes en CRAN http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/index.html Y nadie sabe bien cuántos hay en github. Por cierto, ¿alguno conoce un código para hacer una estimación? El 06/05/2015 a las 16:09, Freddy Omar López Quintero escribió: 2015-05-06 11:00 GMT-03:00 Pedro Concejero Cerezo <pedro.concejerocerezo en

...stion. The answer is that it actually is included, but there are many instances across packages where multiple functions are documented on a single help page. The following brings up such a page... (for XML_3.98-1.9) > library(XML) > ?newXMLNode You can see the same on line... https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/XML/versions/3.98-1.9/topics/newXMLDoc You have dig in to find it. If you are just starting out with XML, you might want to spend some time comparison shopping with the xml2 package. https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/xml2/versions/1.2.0 I like each one, and I use both XML...

Hi Ahmed, When reading from a ncdf file you can use the 'varname', 'lvar' and 'level' arguments - see the 'Details' section in the docs https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/raster/versions/2.6-7/topics/raster <https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/raster/versions/2.6-7/topics/raster> We can't tell what is in the ncdf file from what you report other than it has 4 bands (layers) and that the first is called 'Volumetric.water.content.at...

...herwise it leads to confusion when programming. I understand that the difference exists after asking a question on Stack Overflow: https://stackoverflow.com/q/50766089/914686 This understanding is never mentioned in the documentation - that an Inf date is actually represented as NA: https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/base/versions/3.5.0/topics/as.Date So I'm of the impression that the display should be fixed as a first option (thereby providing clarity/transparency in terms of back-end and output), or the documentation amended (to highlight this) as a second option. [[alternative HTML ve...