search for: rdnattids

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "rdnattids".

Did you mean: rdnattid
2012 Aug 29
0
Add apple MCX directory extensions
I'm trying to load the apple attributes and classes to samba4 using ldbmodify. I can get it to load, sort of. I keep getting errors and having to modify the file. Command I'm using: sudo ldbmodify -v -H ldap://lda.server.local -UAdministrator /home/user/apple-mcx.ldif here is the ldif that I'm loading
2012 Mar 18
2
Samba4: error in schema?
Hi There seems to be a discrepancy in the s4 schema concerning security groups. Domain Users comes with gidNumber: 100. This is however contrary to what the schema allows. You can show this as follows: Create a new group. samba-tool group add mygroup. Use phpldapadmin to add the gidNumber attribute. There is an error because gidNumber is provided by the posixGroup class and that objectclass is
2019 Jul 17
1
Bitlocker
Am 17.07.19 um 11:10 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> > I thought Samba always used schema version 47, so you should have the > objectclass & attributes in AD, this is the ldif for the objectclass: > > cn: ms-FVE-RecoveryInformation > ldapDisplayName: msFVE-RecoveryInformation > governsId: 1.2.840.113556.1.5.253 > objectClassCategory: 1 > rdnAttId: cn >
2013 Mar 17
0
Extending the schema
...ost my notes on it presently... My question is - how do I know this hasn't done anything disastrous? It all looks OK given 5 rigorous minutes of testing but extending schema on AD is generally considered foolhardy as far as I can see. What could go wrong in the future? And what is this about rDNAttIds? Is this a difference/potential incompatibility/something to watch out for between samba4 and MS AD? For instance, if I had a MS AD domain with apple extensions, would this cause any more problems adding a samba4 DC? thanks again, Jim
2017 Aug 21
0
AutoFS
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:52:40 +0200 Jeremy Guasco <jguasco+samba at lncsa.com> wrote: > Le 21/08/2017 à 14:15, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > > > > That's the correct way to do it (the wikipage was wrong, I have > > corrected this) > > > > Have you checked that the objectClasses are in AD ? > > > > ldbsearch --cross-ncs -H
2019 Jul 17
4
Bitlocker
Hi, I am trying to implement bitlocker key management in samba4 ad. This has been posted a view times before: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-December/196771.html https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-July/217168.html According to Andrew and this: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/orphan-topics/ws.10/cc722309(v=ws.10) the Schema should be ready for this.
2015 Aug 13
2
Samba 4 schema upgrade.
Hello, We achieved our Domain Migration from Windows 2003 R2 server to Samba 4.2.3 (sernet binaries). Now Samba 4 is the only domain controller. When we use ADUC and click on Domain Controllers we have an error. At the same time if we have a look at de syslog messages on the server, we can see "ldb: acl_read: CN=SERVER,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=DOMAIN,DC=com cannot find attr[msDS-isRODC] in
2017 Aug 18
4
AutoFS
Hi all, I would like to use AutoFS on Samba but I encounter difficulties with ldap entries. I have already add the Automount Schema from the Wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_schema_extensions) but I can't add "auto_master" and the folowings leaf. I tried : dn: automountmapname=auto_master,dc=MYDOMAIN automountMapName: auto_master objectClass: automountMap
2013 Jan 10
2
Samba 4 "Services for UNIX"? [SOLVED]
To get the automount schema to work with the git checkout of samba 4 I had to modify the automount schema files and separate the attributes from the classes. I also discovered that it's required to have the ntSecurityDescriptor , instanceType, and objectCategory attributes. Without these it will crash whenever you try to browse... I did alot of stopping samba, tarring of /usr/local/samba and
2019 Jul 17
0
Bitlocker
On 17/07/2019 09:50, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to implement bitlocker key management in samba4 ad. This has > been posted a view times before: > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-December/196771.html > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-July/217168.html > > According to Andrew and this: > >
2024 Apr 03
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Hello Samba Dancers, I tried to do function level upgrade on my testing instalation of samba. Finished upgrade from 4.18 to 4.20. I put ad dc functional level = 2016 line to smb.conf, restarted samba. But command samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019 ends with error. Could I ask you check my progress or find solution? samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019 Temporarily overriding
2012 Aug 24
0
Schema modification with auxiliary class vs builtin class and vbscript
Hello The situation is the following : I've successfully created an auxiliary class with an attribute by following this method : http://semifershome.free.fr/semifer/index.php?2008/02/12/42-etendre-le-schema-active-directory-classes-attributs-et-display-specifiers The auxiliary class is "allowedService" and the attribute is "allowedServiceAttribute". The
2024 Apr 10
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Hello I will try give you best answer what I can. - alma linux 9, fresh installation, for testing only in virtualbox - packages from Sernet, installad via YUM from oficial repo - installed version 4.18 (same on original linux) - moved backup from original server, /var/lib/samba + /etc/krb, /etc/default/samba, /etc/samba - original domain created if I remember on 4.15 or 4.16, then schema
2024 Apr 11
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Thanks for getting back to me. Sadly I've not had the time today to attempt the reproduction. Can you, just to save me time, double-check if this happens on a server with the Samba 4.20 being a just from-our-tarball Samba and show the logs that gives? Thanks, Andrew Bartlett On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 10:04 +0000, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote: > HelloI will try give you best answer what I can.
2024 Apr 11
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Hello, please check my progress I did it on the same virtual Centos 9 to avoid posibilities of differencies between original and new installed linux - backup /var/lib/samba storage - uninstalled sernet-samba - installed samba 4.20.0 from tar source code - location default /usr/local/samba - replaced files from /var/lib/samba to /usr/local/samba (to right location) - started samba - done -
2024 Apr 11
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Thanks, that looks like success to me. Perhaps mail SerNet and let them know? Andrew Bartlett On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 08:51 +0000, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote: > Hello,please check my progress > I did it on the same virtual Centos 9 to avoid posibilities of > differencies between original and new installed linux- backup > /var/lib/samba storage- uninstalled sernet-samba- installed samba