Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "rdnattids".
Did you mean:
rdnattid
2012 Aug 29
0
Add apple MCX directory extensions
I'm trying to load the apple attributes and classes to samba4 using
ldbmodify. I can get it to load, sort of. I keep getting errors and having
to modify the file.
Command I'm using:
sudo ldbmodify -v -H ldap://lda.server.local -UAdministrator
/home/user/apple-mcx.ldif
here is the ldif that I'm loading
2012 Mar 18
2
Samba4: error in schema?
Hi
There seems to be a discrepancy in the s4 schema concerning security groups.
Domain Users comes with gidNumber: 100. This is however contrary to what
the schema allows. You can show this as follows:
Create a new group. samba-tool group add mygroup.
Use phpldapadmin to add the gidNumber attribute.
There is an error because gidNumber is provided by the posixGroup class
and that objectclass is
2019 Jul 17
1
Bitlocker
Am 17.07.19 um 11:10 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:
>>
> I thought Samba always used schema version 47, so you should have the
> objectclass & attributes in AD, this is the ldif for the objectclass:
>
> cn: ms-FVE-RecoveryInformation
> ldapDisplayName: msFVE-RecoveryInformation
> governsId: 1.2.840.113556.1.5.253
> objectClassCategory: 1
> rdnAttId: cn
>
2013 Mar 17
0
Extending the schema
...ost my notes on it presently...
My question is - how do I know this hasn't done anything disastrous? It all
looks OK given 5 rigorous minutes of testing but extending schema on AD is
generally considered foolhardy as far as I can see. What could go wrong in
the future?
And what is this about rDNAttIds? Is this a difference/potential
incompatibility/something to watch out for between samba4 and MS AD? For
instance, if I had a MS AD domain with apple extensions, would this cause
any more problems adding a samba4 DC?
thanks again,
Jim
2017 Aug 21
0
AutoFS
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:52:40 +0200
Jeremy Guasco <jguasco+samba at lncsa.com> wrote:
> Le 21/08/2017 à 14:15, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit :
> >
> > That's the correct way to do it (the wikipage was wrong, I have
> > corrected this)
> >
> > Have you checked that the objectClasses are in AD ?
> >
> > ldbsearch --cross-ncs -H
2019 Jul 17
4
Bitlocker
Hi,
I am trying to implement bitlocker key management in samba4 ad. This has
been posted a view times before:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-December/196771.html
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-July/217168.html
According to Andrew and this:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/orphan-topics/ws.10/cc722309(v=ws.10)
the Schema should be ready for this.
2015 Aug 13
2
Samba 4 schema upgrade.
Hello,
We achieved our Domain Migration from Windows 2003 R2 server to Samba 4.2.3 (sernet binaries).
Now Samba 4 is the only domain controller.
When we use ADUC and click on Domain Controllers we have an error.
At the same time if we have a look at de syslog messages on the server, we can see "ldb: acl_read: CN=SERVER,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=DOMAIN,DC=com cannot find attr[msDS-isRODC] in
2017 Aug 18
4
AutoFS
Hi all,
I would like to use AutoFS on Samba but I encounter difficulties with
ldap entries.
I have already add the Automount Schema from the Wiki
(https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_schema_extensions) but I
can't add "auto_master" and the folowings leaf.
I tried :
dn: automountmapname=auto_master,dc=MYDOMAIN
automountMapName: auto_master
objectClass: automountMap
2013 Jan 10
2
Samba 4 "Services for UNIX"? [SOLVED]
To get the automount schema to work with the git checkout of samba 4 I had
to modify the automount schema files and separate the attributes from the
classes. I also discovered that it's required to have the
ntSecurityDescriptor , instanceType, and objectCategory attributes. Without
these it will crash whenever you try to browse... I did alot of stopping
samba, tarring of /usr/local/samba and
2019 Jul 17
0
Bitlocker
On 17/07/2019 09:50, Christian Naumer via samba wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to implement bitlocker key management in samba4 ad. This has
> been posted a view times before:
>
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-December/196771.html
>
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-July/217168.html
>
> According to Andrew and this:
>
>
2024 Apr 03
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Hello Samba Dancers,
I tried to do function level upgrade on my testing instalation of samba.
Finished upgrade from 4.18 to 4.20. I put ad dc functional level = 2016
line to smb.conf, restarted samba. But command samba-tool domain
schemaupgrade --schema=2019 ends with error.
Could I ask you check my progress or find solution?
samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019
Temporarily overriding
2012 Aug 24
0
Schema modification with auxiliary class vs builtin class and vbscript
Hello
The situation is the following :
I've successfully created an auxiliary class with an attribute by
following this method :
http://semifershome.free.fr/semifer/index.php?2008/02/12/42-etendre-le-schema-active-directory-classes-attributs-et-display-specifiers
The auxiliary class is "allowedService" and the attribute is
"allowedServiceAttribute".
The
2024 Apr 10
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Hello
I will try give you best answer what I can.
- alma linux 9, fresh installation, for testing only in virtualbox
- packages from Sernet, installad via YUM from oficial repo
- installed version 4.18 (same on original linux)
- moved backup from original server, /var/lib/samba + /etc/krb,
/etc/default/samba, /etc/samba
- original domain created if I remember on 4.15 or 4.16, then schema
2024 Apr 11
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Thanks for getting back to me. Sadly I've not had the time today to
attempt the reproduction.
Can you, just to save me time, double-check if this happens on a server
with the Samba 4.20 being a just from-our-tarball Samba and show the
logs that gives?
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 10:04 +0000, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote:
> HelloI will try give you best answer what I can.
2024 Apr 11
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Hello,
please check my progress
I did it on the same virtual Centos 9 to avoid posibilities of
differencies between original and new installed linux
- backup /var/lib/samba storage
- uninstalled sernet-samba
- installed samba 4.20.0 from tar source code
- location default /usr/local/samba
- replaced files from /var/lib/samba to /usr/local/samba (to right
location)
- started samba - done
-
2024 Apr 11
1
SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade
Thanks, that looks like success to me.
Perhaps mail SerNet and let them know?
Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 08:51 +0000, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote:
> Hello,please check my progress
> I did it on the same virtual Centos 9 to avoid posibilities of
> differencies between original and new installed linux- backup
> /var/lib/samba storage- uninstalled sernet-samba- installed samba