search for: rdiezmail

> What you are looking for would be a very advanced setup > [...] I don't think so. But we'll see! I would be happy to take a pre-packaged mail server solution like iRedMail which includes RoundCube or whatever. I just need a "easy", practical guide to reconfigure it to 1) download e-mails from a multidrop, and 2) relay external e-mail to the ISP's SMTP server.

Hi all: I am evaluating mail server solutions for a small business. The trouble is, I am only a part-time admin and a newbie to mail servers. Most guides I have seen are rather unrealistic: they encourage you to expose your e-mail server to the Internet, and hope that you have the resources to keep it patched up. I would rather have an internal mail server that collects e-mails from a standard

26. 10. 2020 v 12:15, R. Diez <rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de>: > > I would be happy to take a pre-packaged mail server solution like iRedMail which includes RoundCube or whatever. Have a look at Mailcow too, it comes with almost everything. I?ve been running it for a year now, after many years of using a self-assembled stack, and...

> Have a look at Mailcow too, it comes with almost everything. > I?ve been running it for a year now, after many years of usin > a self-assembled stack, and it?s a bliss. Thanks for the hint. I initially discarded Mailcow because of this: "mailcow: dockerized comes with multiple containers" The installation instructions mention that Docker Compose is required. Not long ago I

...per file! I believe the user console's speed may limit rsync's performance in such scenarios. I think the progress messages should refresh once every 500 ms at most. Thanks, ? R. Diez -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "R. Diez" <rdiezmail-temp2 at yahoo.de> Subject: Progress indication refreshes too often with --info=progress2 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:28:01 +0100 (BST) Size: 4228 URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20140611/2deb2d85/attachment.mht>

Maybe get something like Zimbra, such solutions also have support that you can buy when you need it or don't have time (I guess). -----Original Message----- From: R. Diez [mailto:rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de] Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 6:57 PM To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server Hi all: I am evaluating mail server solutions for a small business. The trouble is, I am only a part-time admin and a newbie to mail s...

...space. How many users will be on the system? If you can handle it, assign all the email passwords. This means you need to contact them out of band. I avoid cpanel or similar internet access to email settings. I use nothing but ssh to maintain my server. ? Original Message ? From: rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de Sent: October 25, 2020 10:57 AM To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server Hi all: I am evaluating mail server solutions for a small business. The trouble is, I am only a part-time admin and a newbie to mail servers. M...

Am 25.10.20 um 21:01 schrieb Marc Roos: > > Maybe get something like Zimbra, such solutions also have support that > you can buy when you need it or don't have time (I guess). > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: R. Diez [mailto:rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de] > Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 6:57 PM > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail > server > > Hi all: > > I am evaluating mail server solutions for a small business. The trouble > is, I am onl...

...ing. I use my brain for antivirus. Antivirus isn't all that good anyway. The key with antivirus is at what point in time do they recognize the file is a virus. I send all my malware links to virus total.com and maybe two will recognize the link goes to malware. ? Original Message ? From: rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de Sent: October 25, 2020 3:25 PM To: lists at lazygranch.com Cc: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server > You need SPF and DKIM for your outgoing email to be accepted. > [...] I don't understand why that is...

> On 26 Oct 2020, at 09:11, R. Diez <rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de> wrote: > >>> >>> I would not advice any company that is continuously being fined for breaking the law. > >> This is not only an overstatement, it is completely irrelevant. Given the OP problem >> statement (small business, part-time admin...

...in them. You do not want anything that changes your data. If your provider uses this mdbox format (maybe others support this also) then messages a user deletes, are not even removed from the server until "doveadm purge" is given ;) -----Original Message----- From: R. Diez [mailto:rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 3:49 PM To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: How to move/reorganise existing e-mails to yearly subfolders Hi all: I am new to e-mail servers and I am evaluating Dovecot. Not really the best combination. 8-) I am trying to find a balance between l...

...quot;smart relay"?? You will communicate only via smtp and only with your provider, and you can use a nice open-source bundle ( dovecot is mandatory because you wrote on that list :) ) in your LAN. > > > > > > > > > > ? Original Message > > > From: rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de > Sent: October 25, 2020 10:57 AM > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server > > > Hi all: > > I am evaluating mail server solutions for a small business. The trouble is, I am only a part-time a...

> what should it do with the non local messages or local messages directly > at aliases? OK, so I gather that the Submission Server cannot do that (yet). My suggestion for a future version would then be: How about running dovecot-lda, if the user happens to be local, or a local alias? Or at least provide some sort of pattern matching: anything matching *@example.com , pass the message to

> Your goal does not sound weird. OK, thanks for the confirmation. > The most painless way might be to fetch incoming messages from > the ISP's IMAP and deliver them to your local dovecot. > A shortened fetchmailrc would read: > > poll remote.server ? > ? user ?, password ? > ? folder 'INBOX' > ? fetchall > ? idle > ? ssl > mda

> You need SPF and DKIM for your outgoing email to be accepted. > [...] I don't understand why that is the case (but keep in mind that I am a newbie). Is it not possible to set up some internal SMTP server that only relies the e-mails to the external ISP SMTP server? The internal SMTP server would then act like a normal user's Thunderbird. At first I tought that the internal

Hi all: I am new to e-mail servers and I am evaluating Dovecot. Not really the best combination. 8-) I am trying to find a balance between legal data retention requirements and online mailbox size. I do not want huge online mailboxes, as doing offline, rotating data backups could then take forever (among other reasons). I would rather avoid online (cloud) backups (data protection etc.). If I

>> I would not advice any company that is continuously being fined for breaking the law. > This is not only an overstatement, it is completely irrelevant.? Given the OP problem > statement (small business, part-time admin, newbie to mail > servers), I do not think there is a better solution > A small server already costs 20 USD / month, running a mail server consumes a

Hi all: I have an Ubuntu 18.04 system. What is the easiest way to run all of my virtual machines with a low priority? Say a "nice" level of 15. I just do not want my virtual machines to have too much of an impact in any other processes on the system. Thanks in advance, rdiez

>> I have an Ubuntu 18.04 system. What is the easiest way to run all of my virtual machines with a low priority? Say a "nice" level of 15. > > You can use the <vcpusched> (and related elements) to control > the schedular nice level up or down > > https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsCPUTuning Thanks for your quick answer. I took at look at

> You could perhaps set 'cpu.shares' cgroup setting on /machine.slice. > This isn't really a nice level in the traditional sense, rather it is > a relative weighting evaluated against other cgroups at the same level. > So if you change it from 1024 to 512, then processes under /machine.slice > will get 1/2 the CPU time vs stuff under /system.slice or /user.slice, >