search for: rcore

...tions/44658867/r-v3-4-0-2-unable-to-find-libgfortran-so-3-on-arch) it seems that gfortran 7 has bumped the .so object to version 4. It seems that a relatively straightforward workaround for the present would be to install a legacy version of gcc alongside the current version. I'm wondering if Rcore or Rdevel are moving towards being able to handle the new compiler version any time soon, and if there are any other workarounds than having two versions of the compiler. Thanks. Chris [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...intainers months ago.) > > Just follow the instructions in the R-admin manual to install from sources. > > OTOH, ' v3.4.0-2 ' is not an R version number, so I think you are > referring to binary distributions on your Linux distro, which are not > the responsibility of 'Rcore or Rdevel' (whatever they are). > > On 23/06/2017 14:40, Chris Cole wrote: > > I'm on Arch Linux kernel version 4.11.6-1 using gcc version 7.1.1: > > > > gcc --version > > gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170516 > > > > I have installed R through the arch package...

...the instructions in the R-admin manual to install from >> sources. >> > >> > OTOH, ' v3.4.0-2 ' is not an R version number, so I think you are >> > referring to binary distributions on your Linux distro, which are not >> > the responsibility of 'Rcore or Rdevel' (whatever they are). >> > >> > On 23/06/2017 14:40, Chris Cole wrote: >> > > I'm on Arch Linux kernel version 4.11.6-1 using gcc version 7.1.1: >> > > >> > > gcc --version >> > > gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170516 >> &...

...was reported to their maintainers months ago.) Just follow the instructions in the R-admin manual to install from sources. OTOH, ' v3.4.0-2 ' is not an R version number, so I think you are referring to binary distributions on your Linux distro, which are not the responsibility of 'Rcore or Rdevel' (whatever they are). On 23/06/2017 14:40, Chris Cole wrote: > I'm on Arch Linux kernel version 4.11.6-1 using gcc version 7.1.1: > > gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170516 > > I have installed R through the arch package manager pacman and when I > attemp...

...t; > Just follow the instructions in the R-admin manual to install from > sources. > > > > OTOH, ' v3.4.0-2 ' is not an R version number, so I think you are > > referring to binary distributions on your Linux distro, which are not > > the responsibility of 'Rcore or Rdevel' (whatever they are). > > > > On 23/06/2017 14:40, Chris Cole wrote: > > > I'm on Arch Linux kernel version 4.11.6-1 using gcc version 7.1.1: > > > > > > gcc --version > > > gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170516 > > > > > > I ha...

On 03/01/2018 6:11 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote: > > > On 26.12.2017 00:45, Juan Telleria wrote: >> However, and hope not to be off-topic, a git repository (github, gitlab, >> codeplex, etc., not just solely github) could constitute a tidy approach, >> and make things easier to R Core :) >> >> By putting the focus on version control, the line of changes made with

I am (for my sins) having to do some work using R under Windoze. I wanted to set up a .Rprofile to control my set-up. The docs on .Rprofile say that it can/should be placed in ``the user's home directory''. ``An Introduction to R'' observes lucidly that this concept needs to be clarified under Windoze. Following the suggestions in An Introduction to R, I tried putting a

...atx why i claimed > bakcwards compatable-ish exactly. > That said its still worth considering imho because of the reasons stated > (and honestly one particular simple reading of the docs might suggest that > this was thr intended behavior all along). Im not a member of Rcore through > so i cant do said considering myself. I agree with Scott, Frederik and you that this changes seems worth considering. As Duncan Murdoch has mentioned, this alone may not be sufficient. In addition to your proposed patch (which I have simplified, not using intersection() but worki...

As a true R-Newbie, I thought I would respond to Zed Shaw's ideas. I think they're all good. I've put comments re the ones which would be critical for me >>>1) An R Cookbook section of the site where people can submit pieces >>>of interesting code that satisfies a need. This would be similar to the >>>Perl/Python/Java Cookbook texts that O'Reilly

Thanks a lot for pointing out the reason (and yes, I am testing quite to stringent in this case - it's my old testing disease ;-) For other readers: The R-devel NEWS is a good source to find possible change reasons: https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/doc/html/NEWS.html On Sun, 2019-09-29 at 08:33 -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 29/09/2019 7:55 a.m., nospam at altfeld-im.de wrote:

...es(mergeddf) will e incompatibly different. Thatx why i claimed bakcwards compatable-ish That said its still worth considering imho because of the reasons stated (and honestly one particular simple reading of the docs might suggest that this was thr intended behavior all along). Im not a member of Rcore through so i cant do said considering myself. Best, ~G On Feb 20, 2018 7:15 PM, <frederik at ofb.net> wrote: Hi Scott, I tried the new patch and can confirm that it has the advertised behavior on a couple of test cases. I think it makes sense to apply it, because any existing code which r...

...ompatable-ish > > exactly. > > > That said its still worth considering imho because of the reasons > stated > > (and honestly one particular simple reading of the docs might > suggest that > > this was thr intended behavior all along). Im not a member of Rcore > through > > so i cant do said considering myself. > > I agree with Scott, Frederik and you that this changes seems > worth considering. > As Duncan Murdoch has mentioned, this alone may not be > sufficient. > > In addition to your proposed patch (which I have sim...

Hi Frederick, It looks like I didn't overwrite the patch.diff file after the last edits. Here's the correct patch (attached and copied below): Index: src/library/base/R/merge.R =================================================================== --- src/library/base/R/merge.R (revision 74280) +++ src/library/base/R/merge.R (working copy) @@ -157,6 +157,14 @@ }