Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rc_1_34_0".
2007 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] 1 Week Before 2.0 Branch Creation
...'s been a test failure. It's a lot of messages to wade through and
read to get this information.
What about a Tinderbox-like setup where we could consult a web page to
see the current status of the repository? Boost has a nice setup:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/index_release.html
It's probably more complex than what we need. Maybe we just need a
page grouping each test under it's suite and marking the result on
each architecture. Something like this:
<begin crappy ASCII art>
----------------------------------------------------...
2007 May 05
5
[LLVMdev] 1 Week Before 2.0 Branch Creation
> Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>
>> How large of a change have you made? With 3 days before the branch
>> creation, I strongly advise people not to be checking in major changes.
>
> Depends how you look at it. Structurally, it separates two files into
> four and moves some functionality from one class to a new class, so in a
> sense that's a big change.
2007 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] 1 Week Before 2.0 Branch Creation
...#39;s a lot of messages to wade through and
> read to get this information.
Right.
> What about a Tinderbox-like setup where we could consult a web page to
> see the current status of the repository? Boost has a nice setup:
>
> http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/index_release.html
>
> It's probably more complex than what we need. Maybe we just need a
> page grouping each test under it's suite and marking the result on
> each architecture. Something like this:
I think that this is a great idea. However, instead of picking u...