search for: rbuildignor

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:38:47 +0000 (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck@myway.com> wrote : >DIFFERENCE BETWEEN USING .RBUILDIGNORE AND NOT > >The reason that the processing is different according to whether one >uses .Rbuildignore or not is that > R CMD build >takes the .Rbuildignore file into account but > R CMD install > R CMD check > R CMD build --binary >do not take .Rbuildignore into ac...

I was trying, on a Linux system, to get a .Rbuildignore file to work. After far too long, I found the problem was the <CR><NL> line endings in the .Rbuildignore file -- I had originally created it on a Windows system, and emacs in Ubuntu was politely hiding that fact from me. The patterns didn't work to exclude files because it wa...

I have some questions about building packages in Windows when using .Rbuildignore . The part of the process that is of interest here is the part that creates the source tree from the tree that contains the .Rbuildignore file. That is, the part of the process that does a build of the original tree creating a .tar.gz and then extracts this file into a source directory that can b...

I've changed to Mercurial for my working copies of survival for a number or resons not relevant to this post. When I do R CMD check, I get some warnings about certain files in the .hg directory with odd names. I've added the following 2 lines to my .Rbuildignore file without effect ^\.hg$ ^\.hg.* I'm not a Perl user so perhaps I'm reading the help page wrong. Any pointers? This doesn't affect Rforge since I don't push any of those files up to there. Terry T.

I'm touching up changes to rpart and have a question with .Rbuildignore. Here is my file tmt1014% more .Rbuildignore test.local \.hg src/print_tree.c The source code included a module "print_tree.c", used for dubugging. Commented out calls to can be found here and there. I want to leave it in the source tree even though no submitted copy of rpart wil...

Full_Name: David O. Nelson Version: 1.4.1 OS: solaris 2.7 Submission from: (NULL) (128.115.150.74) Putting patterns in .Rbuildignore has no effect when the tar being used is gnu tar (1.13) on solaris 2.7, whilst /usr/sbin/tar works perfectly. TO REPRODUCE: The current directory contains a source package directory ./mypkg... bimini.jgi-psf.org% echo >mypkg/foo bimini.jgi-psf.org% echo "foo" >mypkg/.Rbuildignor...

When a package is built it is first moved to a temporary directory (lines 962-980 in build.R). However, this moves *all* files to the temporary directory, even those in Rbuildignore; only later (lines 997-1024) are Rbuildignore files excluded. The problem with this approach is that some files in the package directory may not be movable. On Windows at least, the full path name to a file must not be overly long (around 250 chars). Attempting to copy such files using `file.copy...

The contents of .Rbuildignore seems to affect R CMD build but not R CMD check. I'm using R 2.4.0 on Debian. Is my understanding correct? And is there anything I can do about it? In my case, some of the excluded files contain references to other libraries, so linking fails under R CMD check. I realize I could add the l...

...ily be to piggy back on the R build system as much as possible. In principle, this could get me extra features (binary builds, MS Windows builds) and it would track the things R build does beyond tarring files. But in this case using the R build system seems quite ugly. I could in principle use .Rbuildignore, probably generated dynamically, to exclude files. That doesn't solve the 2nd problem (data.gz becomes data). So does the alternative of doing the tar'ing myself make sense? Is there another option that could hook into the R CMD build process more deeply than the use of .Rbuildignore?...

My docs say files ending in ~ are excluded by default from R CMD build. Doesn't look that way to me. I got them with 1.6.2 and 1.7.0. My documenation is 1.6.0 (that is, the one saying *~ is excluded). I have no .Rbuildignore of my own.

Full_Name: Ben Goodrich Version: 2.6.1 OS: Debian Submission from: (NULL) (128.103.222.166) bzr is another version control system and adds a .bzr folder to the top-level directory of a package, similar to .svn and .git for subversion and git respectively. However, while R CMD build removes directories called .svn, .git, and some others, it does not remove .bzr . As a result, the .bzr folder is

...ily be to piggy back on the R build system as much as possible. In principle, this could get me extra features (binary builds, MS Windows builds) and it would track the things R build does beyond tarring files. But in this case using the R build system seems quite ugly. I could in principle use .Rbuildignore, probably generated dynamically, to exclude files. That doesn't solve the 2nd problem (data.gz becomes data). So does the alternative of doing the tar'ing myself make sense? Is there another option that could hook into the R CMD build process more deeply than the use of .Rbuildignore?...

Noted Duncan and TRUE... I cannot do more immediately unfortunately, that is always the issue of asking a last minute panic attack question before teaching a course involving the package... I do have /doc in my .Rbuildignore for reasons I can no longer remember... I will dig and create a MRE/reprex. The students will download heavy packages, but they probably won't notice. *Apologies* In the meantime, perhaps my question was clear enough to get clarity on: 1) whether having vignettes twice in foders inst/doc and...

Hello: ????? Suggestions for whomever maintains "R CMD": ??? ??????? 1.? Can you change it so it doesn't complain about the presence of ".travis.yml", at least on GitHub? ??? ??????? 2.? What do you suggest people do to find error messages in the output?? I ask, because I'm getting "build failing" from travis-ci.org, but I can't see what failed

Is it possible to consider adding .emacs.desktop and .emacs.desktop.lock to files ignored by R CMD build? Thanks, Georgi -- Dr Georgi Boshnakov tel: (+44) (0)161 306 3684 School of Mathematics fax: (+44) (0)161 306 3669 Alan Turing Building 1.125 The University of Manchester email: Georgi.Boshnakov at manchester.ac.uk Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL UK

...ains, like all the other directories in the package, a '.svn' directory. It seems that R CMD build is somehow missing that one '.svn' in 'src/RGtk2', even though it excludes all the other instances of '.svn'. I've tried putting 'src/RGtk2/.svn' into the .Rbuildignore, but it does not have any effect. I've also looked into the R CMD build script, but I can't find where this problem might occur (but then again, perl is not exactly my thing). Perhaps it has something to do with having a directory with the same name as the package under the 'src' d...

...file(s): .git/objects/00/12947a4bb4379fb0c3bed740314a9f4ac72331 .git/objects/00/21fac22a57a1567389ed34a9dc4f465c6cfd01 .git/objects/00/29da5c289489fdb2249e19f4b165ff5b37b3e6 .git/objects/00/36ad7f586eeac250e6609a1bf938e545101cb0 ... (for about 300 lines) I've tried putting .git in my .Rbuildignore, but this doesn't help the problem. Any ideas? Thanks, Hadley -- http://had.co.nz/

Hi again, I've just uninstalled R2.01 and installed the new R2.10 on my WindowsXP machine. I then attempted to install the vegan package from source files, as I learned to do last week, with the help of some of you. I have updated my path variable to the new R directory (R/rw2010/bin instead of R/rw2001pat/bin), and I've still got the HTMLHelpWorkshop files installed, as well as Perl

Dear all, I am struggling with an issue related to static vignettes: they work, but only when present in double in the tarball -- in the folder inst/doc and vignettes; see below for details. Details: I am pre-compiling heavy vignettes thanks to the vignette builder R.rsp. So basically, I have PDF files which I want the package to use as Vignettes. For this, I have the following in my

Dear R Support Team, I am experiencing an issue with my R package during the `R CMD check` process. A non-standard file named `vert.txt` is being generated in the check directory, causing a NOTE in the check results. Despite adding `vert.txt` to `.Rbuildignore`, the file is still appearing. And, there are no commands in any part of my package's code that would generate this file. Here are the details of the issue: - Package name: RHC - Version: 0.1.0 - R version: 4.4.2 - Operating system: Windows 10 Attached (package building error): ? che...