Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "raw_vector".
Did you mean:
ac_vector
2005 Sep 27
1
Future plans for raw data type?
I've been working with raw vectors quite a bit and was wondering if
the R team might comment on where they see raw vector support going in
the long run. Is the intent that 'raw' will eventually become a first
class data type on the same level as 'integer'? Or should 'raw' have
more limited support, by design?
For example, with very minor changes to subassign.c to
2005 Oct 06
0
R-2.2.0 is released
...SD systems
(and followed tar chf, so there could be no symbolic links in
the tarball).
o Subassignment of length zero vectors to NULL gave garbage
answers. (PR#8157)
o Automatic coercion of raw vectors to lists was missing, so for a
list (or data frame) z, z[["a"]] <- raw_vector did not work
and now does. This also affected DF$a <- raw_vector for a
data frame DF.
o The internal code for commandArgs() was missing PROTECTs.
o The width for strwrap() was used as one less than specified.
o R CMD INSTALL was not cleaning up after an unsuccessful
install of...
2005 Oct 06
0
R-2.2.0 is released
...SD systems
(and followed tar chf, so there could be no symbolic links in
the tarball).
o Subassignment of length zero vectors to NULL gave garbage
answers. (PR#8157)
o Automatic coercion of raw vectors to lists was missing, so for a
list (or data frame) z, z[["a"]] <- raw_vector did not work
and now does. This also affected DF$a <- raw_vector for a
data frame DF.
o The internal code for commandArgs() was missing PROTECTs.
o The width for strwrap() was used as one less than specified.
o R CMD INSTALL was not cleaning up after an unsuccessful
install of...