search for: ravasio

Hey everyone, first of all, thank you for the tremendous work and effort on making Rails more awesome every day. I''ve brought up this "issue" on Github last Friday. [1] Steve Klabnik told me to bring the discussion here, as it''s more appropriate. The thing is, there is some amount of logic scattered around Rails (and its tests) that depends upon error/exception

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:02:45 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > we are testing a new AD domain that will replace our old NT4 one, and > we are setting up a new cifs vserver of our Netapp filer (running > Clustered Dataontap 9.2). > > The new AD domain was a clean deployment created us...

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:11:23 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > On 10/20/2017 05:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> So I tried what is suggested in this thread: > >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/thread.html#199609 > > > > I really should have said...

On 10/23/2017 09:29 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > All that using '--use-rfc2307' does is allow the use of rfc2307 > attributes such as 'uidNumber' and 'gidNumber', it does not > populate any of the rfc2307 attributes. > > DCs works slightly different from Unix domain members, they use > 'xidNumber' attributes in idmap.ldb, these attributes

On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:27:18 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > On 10/23/2017 10:26 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > OK, have you tried asking the Netapp company, 'how do I use this > > with Active Directory' ? > > In this specific case no, but I already tried to open CIFS...

On 10/20/2017 05:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> So I tried what is suggested in this thread: >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/thread.html#199609 > > I really should have said there that using '513' wasn't a good idea ;-) ok I'll revert to 100 ;-) > The only way to get the same IDs everywhere is to use the winbind >

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:47:43 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > Sorry for eventually wrong AD terminology! Don't worry about it, it is just confusing when you call a DC, a PDC, call it your first DC or anything, just don't call it a PDC ;-) > > > You haven't fixed the 'xidNumber...

On 10/23/2017 10:26 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > OK, have you tried asking the Netapp company, 'how do I use this with > Active Directory' ? In this specific case no, but I already tried to open CIFS support cases but at the end they tell me that It works as expected with a MS DC and that Samba DC is not supported by them. I cannot omit that I use Samba because they always

Hi, we are testing a new AD domain that will replace our old NT4 one, and we are setting up a new cifs vserver of our Netapp filer (running Clustered Dataontap 9.2). The new AD domain was a clean deployment created using "samba-tool domain provision --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 ...". All seems to work well and the Netapp filer joins the domain without errors and seems to run fine.

Sorry for eventually wrong AD terminology! > You haven't fixed the 'xidNumber:100 issue', giving 'Domain Users' the > ID of '513' is not a good idea and I think you may have just changed > '100' in idmap.ldb to '513' >From the AD DC (;-)) shell the user was missing the "Domain Users" group and we tought that could be a xidNumber