search for: rathnayake

On 11 July 2016 at 17:06, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > Ignore me please, noted that you said it's the identical configuration with > just the library re-ordering. > > Shall I revert the link ordering until we have time to investigate? I can't see anything wrong in reverting the order,...

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Asiri Rathnayake > <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> When I tried to build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX, I found out that > >&g...

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> When I tried to build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX, I found out that >> it doesn't try to use the in-tree...

...ly need to use the llvm builders infrastructure, just setup > a local jenkins (or whatever) bot that triggers from the llvm svn, see > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10014252/jenkins-ci-how-to-trigger-builds-on-svn-commit > > > > > 2016-05-27 22:26 GMT+03:00 Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > >> Hi Galina, >> >> I would like to setup a silent buildslave for some experiments. >> Essentially, I would like to receive build requests from the llvm master >> buildbot, do my local builds but not publish res...

...#39;s easy to switch a slave between them. To add slave/builder please add your slave and builder to zorg, but point your slave to silent master: use lab.llvm.org:9994 instead of lab.llvm.org:9990 It's address: http://lab.llvm.org:8014 Thanks Galina On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Asiri Rathnayake < asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > I was hoping to avoid the trouble of having to setup a master buildbot. > > But may be it's just easier to run Zorg as-is locally alongside the > buildslave. I'll give that a go. > > Cheers, > > / Asiri > > On Fr...

I changed the library order in response to a review comment [1], but can't see how that's causing this failure. @Renato: can you check on that box if reverting the library order actually fixes the problem? Just to double check if that's indeed the cause. Thanks. / Asiri [1] http://reviews.llvm.org/D14293#inline-118681 On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Craig, Ben via llvm-dev <

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Asiri Rathnayake < asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> > On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Scott Smith <scott.smith at purestorage.com> >> wrote: >&...

Hi, I'm trying to generate some SPARCv8 assembly for a sparc target that doesn't have an FPU. I'm unable to get the flow to generate calls to a soft-float library. Since I wasn't able to find a definitive answer, I was hoping someone might be able to offer some pointers or shed some light. Running "clang -c -emit-llvm -msoft-float test.c -o test.bc" doesn't generate

Hi All, libcxx is fairly well designed to work in a no-exceptions environment, with most of the sources diligently using the _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS macro. However, it seems to have bit-rotted a bit and could use some TLC right now. A no-exceptions variety of libcxx would be quite useful when you want to use all of libcxx goodness without the overhead of exceptions (especially in embedded

> I find it amusing that you think that there's a "correct behavior" when the standard specifies > that an operation should throw an exception and you have disabled exceptions. You got me there! I think it's OK to be consistent across all the places and call abort(), this is what I've been doing in my current patch. I will double check this behavior with other

...l libc++ you can easily work around this by running `ninja install-cxx install-cxxabi` before running any of the LLVM or Clang build targets. /Eric On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Asiri Rathnayake > <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> When I tried to build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX, I found out that > >&g...

You don't really need to use the llvm builders infrastructure, just setup a local jenkins (or whatever) bot that triggers from the llvm svn, see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10014252/jenkins-ci-how-to-trigger-builds-on-svn-commit 2016-05-27 22:26 GMT+03:00 Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi Galina, > > I would like to setup a silent buildslave for some experiments. > Essentially, I would like to receive build requests from the llvm master > buildbot, do my local builds but not publish results on the main buildbot &gt...

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > When I tried to build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX, I found out that > it doesn't try to use the in-tree libcxx but looks for one built and > installed > in the system. > IIRC, -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX reduces to passing --stdlib=libc++ (see [1]) to the compiler. What you can

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Scott Smith <scott.smith at purestorage.com> > wrote: > > > > well, top-of-branch lldb uses this code, that's how I found it. Do you > mean libc++'s demangler? > > Thanks for explaining, this is the first time

Hi Galina, I would like to setup a silent buildslave for some experiments. Essentially, I would like to receive build requests from the llvm master buildbot, do my local builds but not publish results on the main buildbot (or complain to users when the builds fail). Would such a setup be possible? I looked at the documentation [1] but that seems to describe a normal buildslave setup. Thanks. /