search for: rathj

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "rathj".

Did you mean: rath
2004 Aug 10
2
Re: VoIP SPAM, what's next ?
At 7:14 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Soren Rathje wrote: >Gang, > >Do anyone have a clue on how they do this ?? > >"QOVIA FILES PATENTS FOR VOICE SPAM BLOCKING TECHNOLOGY" >http://www.qovia.com/company/news/06.28.2004_voip_spam_patent_app_final.htm > >"Qovia ready to take on VoIP spam" >http://www.nw...
2004 Aug 10
0
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] VoIP SPAM, what's next ?
Soren Rathje wrote: > Next thing will probably be a sbl.e164.org service to block spammers like we do with email... :-) Actually we don't need to do that, using normal NAPTR record can be used instead. We know the IP the call is coming from, we can find out from the NAPTR where calls normally go to b...
2004 Oct 05
1
Brazillian Caller ID: almost there...
Hello, Talking with Soren Sratje about Caller ID in Brazil, we compare ours DTMF tones captured by ztmonitor. wcfxo correctly recognize the "DTMF CLIP" and asterisk shot the AST_STATE_PRERING correctly. But the DTMF tones are not reconized. In the chan_zap.c, the code: if (f->frametype == AST_FRAME_DTMF) { (...) Does not occurs because the frametype is always reconized as voice
2004 Nov 21
3
I Am Missing Something Somewhere Somehow!
hi, I am not registered my SIP Phone with Asterisk i spend almost one day but find no luck my configs are. sip.conf [general] port=5060 bindaddr=192.168.10.195 disallow=all allow=alaw allow=ulaw [101] username=101 type=friend secret=1234 host=192.168.10.195 context=sip callerid="101"<101> defaultip=192.168.10.176 extensions.conf [globals] [incoming] exten =>
2004 Sep 07
3
DTMF Caller ID w/o polarity inversion
Hi Folks, I've been looking around and found some references of some Caller ID patches (Mantis bug#9) for X100P and TDM400 for Netherlands, Sweden and UK. It's been quite hard to understand what has finally been incorporated to the distribution (if anything) or which patches must be applied in witch snapshot of the repository. I've tried some different approaches but nothing worked
2004 Aug 11
3
X100P outbound only (Don't answer)
I tried implementing my * and it didn't pass the spouse factor at this time. I wanted to hook it up for outbound only at this point to get a better handle on the dial plans and the echo problem. I thought this might have been done before as a natural part of testing - but maybe not. In wcfxo.c I found this: if (!wc->offhook && !wc->ringdebounce) { if
2005 Jan 08
0
FYI: NIST issues recommendations for secure VOIP
Following is sharelessly copied from one of the newsgroups I read on grc.com.. /Soren NIST issues recommendations for secure VOIP http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/34747-1.html http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-58/SP800-58-final.pdf *********************************************************** Quote *********************************************************** The National