Displaying 20 results from an estimated 139 matches for "ratelimits".
Did you mean:
ratelimit
2013 Nov 06
1
Frequent RRL false negatives when using multiple server processes on Linux
Hi,
Please advise how to use Response Rate Limiting on a server which has
multiple NSD server processes (nsd.conf server section has server-count
> 1).
We have a problem with NSD v3.2.16 repeatedly unblocking and blocking
again a single source which is flooding positive queries at a ~steady
700 qps rate. rrl-ratelimit setting is the default 200 qps. The
unblock-block happens multiple times
2009 Dec 05
2
git - compile error ratelimit - missing include <linux/ratelimit.h>
Building today in git - kernel 2.6.32 (git) + nouveau (git).
Failed as nouveau_irq.c doesn't include <linux/ratelimit.h>
Added the include to nouveau_irq.c and was able to compile... not sure
that's where it ought to go.
2004 Feb 10
22
Re: [Shorewall-newbies] specific log-prefix ... patch
Let''s move this to the Shorewall Development list....
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:14 pm, xavier wrote:
> here is a patch to allow this :
> |ACCEPT<10/sec:20>:debug fw lan:$ntp_servers udp 123 - - - - ntp
>
> a problem with the patch is that now the logprefix is mandatory.
> i''m trying to debug it, but i can''t find the flaw.
Also, with
2005 Feb 03
0
best patch for iptables ratelimiting
According to the F.A.Q. there''s a patch to do
ratelimiting:
http://etudiant.univ-mlv.fr/~jpetazzo/bytelimit.tgz
Going with the thought that this is current..I tried
it.
I wasn''t able to get it to compile, as support for
invert was causing a failure(i think). But i was able
to get it to compile when I changed line 73 and my box
loaded the module.
Anyone know if this will do
2011 Aug 08
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: ratelimit the generation printk for the free space cache
A user reported getting spammed when moving to 3.0 by this message. Since we
switched to the normal checksumming infrastructure all old free space caches
will be wrong and need to be regenerated so people are likely to see this
message a lot, so ratelimit it so it doesn''t fill up their logs and freak them
out. Thanks,
Reported-by: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by:
2017 Sep 12
2
[PATCH] drm: qxl: ratelimit pr_info message, reduce log spamming
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
Simply mmap'ing /dev/dri/card0 repeatedly will spam the kernel
log with qxl_mmap information messages. The following example code
illustrates this:
int main(void)
{
int fd = open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDONLY);
if (fd == -1)
err(1, "open failed");
for (;;) {
void *m = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ,
MAP_SHARED,
2017 Sep 12
2
[PATCH] drm: qxl: ratelimit pr_info message, reduce log spamming
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
Simply mmap'ing /dev/dri/card0 repeatedly will spam the kernel
log with qxl_mmap information messages. The following example code
illustrates this:
int main(void)
{
int fd = open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDONLY);
if (fd == -1)
err(1, "open failed");
for (;;) {
void *m = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ,
MAP_SHARED,
2013 Feb 04
1
NSD 3.2.15 released (+RRL)
Dear NSD users,
Here is the release candidate for NSD 3.2.15. This comes with ILNP
support, NSD-RRL and different TSIG initialization (it fails if it can't
find no suitable algorithms, instead of can't find 'one of the'). Plus
some bugfixes.
The NSD-RRL implementation is based on the work by Vixie and Schryver.
However, because of the code-diversity argument that is at the basis
2017 Sep 12
0
[PATCH] drm: qxl: ratelimit pr_info message, reduce log spamming
Hi Colin,
On 12 September 2017 at 10:45, Colin King <colin.king at canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>
> Simply mmap'ing /dev/dri/card0 repeatedly will spam the kernel
> log with qxl_mmap information messages. The following example code
> illustrates this:
>
> int main(void)
> {
> int fd =
2017 Sep 12
1
[PATCH] drm: qxl: ratelimit pr_info message, reduce log spamming
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 03:02:04PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> That said, I'm not sure how useful the information is - perhaps it's
> better to drop it all together?
Or a WARN_ONCE().
regards,
dan carpenter
2020 Feb 05
1
[PATCH] drm/virtio: ratelimit error logging
Avoid flooding the log in case we screw up badly.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
index 5914e79d3429..83f22933c3bb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
+++
2017 Sep 12
1
[PATCH] drm: qxl: ratelimit pr_info message, reduce log spamming
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 03:02:04PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> That said, I'm not sure how useful the information is - perhaps it's
> better to drop it all together?
Or a WARN_ONCE().
regards,
dan carpenter
2024 Aug 01
0
ratelimiting for PerSourcePenalties logging
Hi,
A few people have requested rate-limiting for PerSourcePenalties logging.
These patches add it. Please give them a try if you're interested in this
feature.
-d
-------------- next part --------------
2006 Aug 19
9
SSH scans vs connection ratelimiting
Gang,
For months now, we're all seeing repeated bruteforce attempts on SSH.
I've configured my pf install to ratelimit TCP connections to port 22
and to automatically add IP-addresses that connect too fast to a table
that's filtered:
table <lamers> { }
block quick from <lamers> to any
pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 22
modulate
2004 Feb 13
6
Error: Rate Limiting only available with ACCEPT, DNAT[-], REDIRECT[-] and LOG
I think it would be nice to be able to rate limit an action, too..
suppose I have an action named Accept_good_source :
ACCEPT - - tcp - 1024:65535
ACCEPT - - udp - 1024:65535
and that i want to use it in an action called AllowCVS,
i can''t limit the cvs usage, but only the general use of
Accept_good_source...
same goes for userset...
as each rule will give one iptables command,
I
2015 Sep 01
3
poor performance with dom0 on centos7
Hi All
it is possible to tune dom0/domU for better IO/network performance?
Since I have changed to Cenots7 dom0, I have a really poor IO
performance inside a PV VM.
I have already done what is described on
http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Tuning_Xen_for_Performance
It is better now but still significantly worse than with centos6 dom0
my settings:
xen parameter: dom0_mem=1024M cpufreq=xen
2019 Dec 28
2
tinydns to nsd
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100
richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf
> to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include
> files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP
> rereads the zone info now.
Wrong, I made a mistake it
2018 Feb 09
3
[PATCH] mm/page_poison: move PAGE_POISON to page_poison.c
The PAGE_POISON macro is used in page_poison.c only, so avoid exporting
it. Also remove the "mm/debug-pagealloc.c" related comment, which is
obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
include/linux/poison.h | 7
2018 Feb 09
3
[PATCH] mm/page_poison: move PAGE_POISON to page_poison.c
The PAGE_POISON macro is used in page_poison.c only, so avoid exporting
it. Also remove the "mm/debug-pagealloc.c" related comment, which is
obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
include/linux/poison.h | 7
2020 Feb 11
1
[PATCH 39/62] x86/sev-es: Harden runtime #VC handler for exceptions from user-space
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Joerg Roedel <joro at 8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
>
> Send SIGBUS to the user-space process that caused the #VC exception
> instead of killing the machine. Also ratelimit the error messages so
> that user-space can't flood the kernel log.
What would cause this? CPUID? Something else?
--Andy