search for: rashkovskii

Hello, Just decided to check whether I am doing something that makes sense or not. I was thinking about how cool would it be to re-use examples (just like we reuse story scenarios with GivenScenario). I was not sure if this possibility already exists in rspec (and, honestly, was lazy to check), so I have created this helper: def given_it(name) example_definition =

Hey, May be it is just too deep night over here and I''m missing something though I got this failure on {{{response.should_not redirect_to}}}: ''QueuesController should allow authenticated user to access ''show'''' FAILED Matcher does not support should_not. See Spec::Matchers for more information about matchers. Also I''ve found this in

Hello, I''ve just released rspec-ext 0.0.1 (http://rubyforge.org/projects/ rspec-ext/) It is gem-installable (rspec-ext gem) It is simply two _experimental_ (and may be not well tested) extensions of rspec as for now: * specify_negatively (http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/1/25/rspec- specify_negatively, http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/2/3/ specify_negatively-updated) * aspects (http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/2/13/rspec-aspects) As I''ve said above, all this stuff is pretty much experimental, though I use it in some real proj...

I''ve become very fond of Yurii Rashkovskii''s "aspects". For such a simple change they make it a LOT easier to navigate, read and verify specs. Are there any plans to include something like this in RSpec? Ashley

Hello, I have played a bit on a negative specification idea: http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/1/25/rspec-specify_negatively What do you think about it? Yurii Rashkovskii Technology Director Railsware.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070125/12c4f473/attachment.h...

Hi. I''m upgrading a project from an 0.8.0 pre-release gem to 0.8.2. I''ve installed the 0.8.2 gem, and the rspec_on_rails 0.8.2 plugin: ruby script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_0_8_2/rspec When I try to run my specs though, I get the below error. It''s as if the spec_helper cannot find "spec/rails". I''ve noticed that

Hello, Just thought it could be interesting for some of you. I''ve written rspecs for acts_as_authenticated plugin. http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/01/01/rspec-on-rails- acts_as_authenticated I''m not sure they are 100% ok, but they seem to be :) Thank you, Yurii.

I''ve started using specs as a to-do list. I write explicitly violated specs so I know what to come back to. But a lot of the time, that means if I start to work on another piece of functionality covered by the same spec, it''s hard to tell what I''m working on now from the explicit failues. I run all my specs through TextMate to use the HTML output, so I go by

The new "pending" example feature reminds me of a feature I''ve been bouncing around in my head, to aid in refactoring. Often, when I''m changing existing behaviour, I know that certain aspects of the old behaviour should change. Imagine changing the "it" method to perhaps "not" or "old" or "removed"... The behaviour would be to

We''d like to get some feedback on RSpec 0.9 before we start pushing out releases via Rubyforge''s gem server and update the website. We have therefore made the first beta of 0.9 available - both prepackaged and tagged in subversion (see below). RSpec 0.9 introduces a new API for expectations, which essentially means that your underscores go away (there has been other discussions