search for: rarely

Can anyone point me in the right direction of figuring out what downweight() is doing? I am using vegan to perform CCA on diatom assemblage data. I have a lot of rare species, so I want to reduce the influence of rare species in my CCA. I have read that some authors reduce rare species by only including species with an abundance of at least 1% in at least one sample (other authors use 5% as a

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20120604/b313c7fa/attachment.pl>

Dear all, I was doing an experiment to disprove some theory therefore performing lot of random simulation. Goal is to show the audience that although something has very rare chance to occur but it doesn't mean that event would be impossible. In this case after getting that rare event I need to show that same scenario for multiple times to explain other audience. Hence I need to somehow

I have a data frame with some factor columns. I want to drop the rows with rare factor values (and remove the factor values from the factors). E.g., frame$MyFactor takes values A 1,000 times, B 2,000 times, C 30 times and D 4 times. I want to remove all rows which assume rare values (<1%), i.e., C and D. i.e., frame <- frame[[! (frame$MyFactor %in% c("A","B"))]] except

On 01/07/2015 05:33 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > How does this compare with classical approaches of loop peeling, > partitioning, fission, or whatever you might call it? I'm still developing a good sense for this, but let me lay out some observations. Fair warning, this is going to be long and rambling. Let's start with a toy example: while(c) { x = this->x; y =

I am trying to understand how the SOM algorithm works using library(class) SOM function. I have a 1000*10 matrix and I want to be able to summarize the different types of 10-element vectors. In my real world case it is likely that most of the 1000 values are of one kind the rest of other (this is an oversimplification). Say for example: InputA<-matrix(cos(1:10),nrow=900,ncol=10,byrow=TRUE)

New .deb packages for R 3.0.0 on Raring Ringtail (13.04) are available on both [CRAN](http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/) and my [Launchpad PPA](https://launchpad.net/~marutter/+archive/rrutter). Some notes for this release. - The initial build for Raring Ringtail did not come with Tcl/Tk being supported. This issue has been addressed and the current release supports Tcl/Tk. -

Dear Sir Can't find /etc/apt/sources.list file please help. When I tried the command on terminal some errors has occurred as follows- manjulata@manjulata-HP-Pavilion-dv4-Notebook-PC:~/Desktop/ndnSIM$ deb http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/cran/bin/linux/ubuntu raring/ No command 'deb' found, did you mean: Command 'dab' from package 'bsdgames' (universe) Command 'dwb'

I hacked around a bit with the simple case of tracing just classes and defs (no multiclasses or defms). Below you will see my test file and then the output produced. Note that the regular output from the PrintRecords backend follows the trace, so you can see the final classes and records there. Once the trace can be selective, it makes sense to add another option for PrintRecords that restricts

> -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 2:52 PM > To: Daniel Berlin > Cc: Robinson, Paul; llvm-dev; LLDB; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; openmp-dev > (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org); Rafael Espíndola > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial > draft for an LLVM Code of

I have several too and I also see this problem on occasion. Like you say, it is fairly rare and I can't pinpoint a cause or tell if it is a symptom of something else. I think I wrote to tech support about it but never heard anything. I'm wondering how long they will continue to support the phone. -Nate > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Geis

Hello, I am reaching out for a problem I have seem to hit wall on. I am trying to build a rare event model:- Default event occurred in NY/NJ area. Some key statistics: 138 default aka 4bp (.04%). Obviously my logistic and robust logistic models are failing Hosmer GOF tests and so I am thinking about bootstrapping data. I found a great read on R-help, but I was wondering if someone can help me

Sir, This mail to signal a problem : R graphics don't work on my Dell laptop with the processor Intel? Core? i7-2640M CPU @ 2.80GHz ? 4 and graphic card Intel? Sandybridge Mobile x86/MMX/SSE2 since the update with Ubuntu raring ringtail. It works perfectly with the previous version ubuntu quantal and previous versions. Thank you for your attention Sincerely yours C. Krzisch

...with the Evolution Calendar (which I do not use) crashing, when I exited from Evolution, has almost completely disappeared. One or more of the updates since the huge update eliminated most of that problem. It seems to only happen now when I am going to log out of my Desktop or shut it down and only rarely.

On 7/23/19 8:42 PM, John McCall via llvm-dev wrote: > > On 21 Jul 2019, at 12:29, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > > Yes, indeed! > > The SBCL lisp compiler (not llvm based) used to emit functions > which would > return either via ret to the usual instruction after the call, or > else load > the return-address from the stack, then jump 2

...below sample c++ code. Thanks, Jun > Hi Jun, > > It's a very common that C++ exception handling code blow up the inlining > cost of the a function. > > It became more when compiler inlines calls in exception handling code. > > As exception handling code executes very rarely, you can apply some > heuristic in inliner to avoid inlining > for calls in exception region. By this it will open up more inlining > opportunities. > > I'm not sure how much this will help, as these cases are very rare. > > How do you justify gains of this, do you have any...

...it works, should these variables be added to the docs at >>>> http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html ? >>> >>> Yes. >> >> It probably makes sense to add LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB, but I would discourage adding BUILD_SHARED_LIBS to that document. BUILD_SHARED_LIBS is rarely what people actually want, and a lot of people gravitate to it because the wording is similar to the autoconf —enable-shared flag. > > Considering that BUILD_SHARED_LIBS is rarely what people want, wouldn’t it make sense to document it to explicitly discourage people from using it and avoid...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11161 Bug ID: 11161 Summary: rare crash in hlink.c:536 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: sbrabec at

Hello, I am a Samba user, and I have been using long time without any big trouble. Last week I was working with a friend, using Fedora and Samba 3. Excuse me, I don't know exactly which Samba version. After some problems, we shared a directory (for example, /data). This works, fine. Then we created two new subdirectories: /data/a /data/b Then we access to shared resource using smbclient,

I'am having a rare situation with ssl connections. I can connect to 993/995 but the connection never starts. >From the client side i test with: $ openssl s_client -connect example.com:993 CONNECTED(00000003) and stays like that... waiting. In the other side i see in dovecot logs: Disconnected: Inactivity (no auth attempts): rip=x.x.x.x, lip=x.x.x.x, TLS handshaking this happens from