Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "rantish".
Did you mean:
ranish
2006 Feb 07
7
What happens to manuals.rubyonrails.com?
Hi guys,
does anyone know what happened to the manuals site? I have not been
able to connect to http://manuals.rubyonrails.com for two days (I
started reading all about RoR yesterday and finished most of the
tutorials i could gather, and really enjoyed playing with the rails).
TIA!
-xiheng
--
Posted with http://DevLists.com. Sign up and save your time!
2006 Nov 23
2
Need SAN suggestion
Hello,
It is not total off-topic since almost all connected servers will be RHEL
and CentOS. :)
We are considering to purchase new storage system. The most probably we
will be choosing between HP (EVA6000), EMC (CX3-20C) and Hitachi (similar
model).
iSCSI connection is also required.
What are your experienced with listed systems? What to avoid? What ot
expect?
Now I just know
2004 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] Inline Assembly
...table too).
o If you want inline asm to compile programs out of the box, it'll be
more painful than what you've described.
o Changing llvm-gcc so that it doesn't look like an i386 compiler might
make it easier to compile applications with optional inline asm.
Sorry if this is a bit rantish; my thoughts on the matter are not well
organized.
>
> One other thing we can do that *might* be useful. If a function contains
> only inline assembly instructions, we could circumvent the usual calling
> conventions for that function.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Reid.
>
>...
2004 Sep 13
4
[LLVMdev] Inline Assembly
In order to get to the next stage with LLVM (like compiling a kernel) we
need to allow "pass through" of inline assembly so things like device
drivers, interrupt vectors, etc. can be written. While this feature
breaks the "pure" LLVM IR, I don't see any way around it.
So, I thought I'd bring it up here so we can discuss potential
implementations. I think we should