Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "rankm".
Did you mean:
rank
2006 Jan 30
1
weights argument in the lmer function in lme4
...13.529 14.367 0.453 2
D NA NA 13.353 NA NA NA NA -0.051 4
E 12.775 12.767 12.823 12.767 14.036 12.631 13.645 -0.495 6
F 13.043 13.338 12.641 12.977 13.848 12.425 13.530 -0.448 5
GCAm -0.200 -0.169 -0.165 -0.103 0.736 -0.428 0.329 NA NA
RankM 6.000 5.000 4.000 3.000 1.000 7.000 2.000 NA NA
Despite any shortcomings in my ran.eff function, those values look
alright, but they're the same (to any number of decimal places) as I'd
get without a weights argument. Just to check that the weights really
don't effect i...