search for: randywallacejr

Hi LARTC experts, Can you help me with this scenario? I have been lurking on this list for a while, but I am very green wrt advanced routing. I have a slackware linux based server in a vehicle with a high bandwidth satellite connection which is only available while the vehicle is stationary. This satellite connection comes in via eth0. But while the vehicle is moving or stationary, we can

...random selection of gateway, per TCP connection?" ,i can do it right now but my if same remote site( ip ) always goto the same gateway,i think that is ip_route_cache problem or something like this how can I do ?? Kuolung ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Wallace" <randywallacejr@gmail.com> To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 8:06 PM Subject: [LARTC] Re: Using multiple network interfaces (internetconnections) separately >> Hi, >> >> I need a solution for this case: >> I have a PC(as server) with 3 (or more) Ethernet por...

Hi, I need a solution for this case: I have a PC(as server) with 3 (or more) Ethernet ports and 3 (or more) Internet access through each Ethernet interface. (from different ISP''s and with different IP''s of course) I need to download files (using wget or whatever else) through each interface (internet line) separately. For example i need to download "file1" through

On a router, there is no need for and IMQ because there is always an egress path. For example: Internet -> eth1 -> iptables -> routing -> ... -> egress qdisc -> eth0 -> LAN LAN -> eth0 -> iptables -> routing -> .... -> egress qdisc -> eth1 -> Internet Local Process / Proxy -> routing -> iptables -> egress qdisc -> eth1/eth0 ->

HI All , I am running a FC6 box with two internet links with load balance . Every thing is working fine expect the MSN connection that failed and reconnect every time and SSL connections . I would link to know if with the nona howto I could fix that . I have been tried with no success to redirect that connection only to one link but its look like do not work . Here my configuration :

IMHO, i believe that it would be more realistic to have one router providing load balancing/dead gateway to one/several subnet(s). otherwise, each server/user would have to do their own load balancing for each subnet! that, or you would need 3 routers, one for each subnet and a linux router doing the load balancing in the middle. with 3 routers, the load balancing configurations

I''ve set up Traffic Shaping on a Linux Router. Using HTB with SFQ, i''m trying to slow down heavy downloading for 20 subscribers over a 2048 kbit downlink. I''m classifying internet related traffic using iptables marking. bri0 is my local lan bridge, receiving egress traffic destined for subscribers. tc qdisc add dev bri0 root handle 1: htb default 2 tc class add dev