search for: randomseed

...plus <- function(){T or F} if (is.S()) { RNGkind <- function(kind=NULL) {# With a null argument this returns the current kind. # kind = "default" resets the RNG to the Splus default. # Splus does not allow arbitrary setting of .Random.seed so # .RandomSeed is used. The existence of .RandomSeed is # used to indicate whether an alternate RNG is used and the # first element of .RandomSeed indicates the generator. if ( is.null(kind)) {if(exists(".RandomSeed")) kind <- c("Wichmann-Hill")[1+.Rand...

...t; Cc: rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] Setting the R random seed from Rcpp > > > You can do something like this (i'm on my phone, so you might have to change it): > > Environment g = Environment::global_env() ; > Environment::Binding RandomSeed = g[".Random.seed"] ; > > You get the current value of the binding like this: > > NumericVector someVariable = RandomSeed ; > > And then when you want to set the variable: you just do : > > RandomSeed = someVariable ; > > The Environment::Binding class a...

...sample(1000:9999, size=1) This code exists within a script that starts with the command: remove(list=ls()) Each time that I run the script, it yields the same random number: 6420. I thought that the problem might result from deleting the random seed. However, list=ls() does not include .RandomSeed. To my surprise, I can't replicate the problem with a 2-line script: remove(list-ls()) sample(1000:9999, size=1) Also, the same problem occurs if I use runif instead of sample. Thoughts? Dennis Dennis Fisher MD P < (The "P Less Than" Company) Phone: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-75...

...RNG_COMMAND_FILE); if (options->max_startups == -1) options->max_startups = 10; if (options->max_startups_rate == -1) @@ -187,7 +190,7 @@ #endif sPasswordAuthentication, sListenAddress, sPrintMotd, sIgnoreRhosts, sX11Forwarding, sX11DisplayOffset, - sStrictModes, sEmptyPasswd, sRandomSeedFile, sKeepAlives, sCheckMail, + sStrictModes, sEmptyPasswd, sRandomSeedFile, sPrngCommandFile, sKeepAlives, sCheckMail, sUseLogin, sAllowUsers, sDenyUsers, sAllowGroups, sDenyGroups, sIgnoreUserKnownHosts, sHostDSAKeyFile, sCiphers, sProtocol, sPidFile, sGatewayPorts, sDSAAuthentication, sXAu...

...n (16 -> 32) debug1: Installing crc compensation attack detector. debug1: Received encrypted confirmation. debug1: Doing password authentication. mr at tcm30's password: " # This is ssh server systemwide configuration file. " Port 22 ListenAddress 0.0.0.0 HostKey /etc/ssh_host_key RandomSeed /etc/ssh_random_seed ServerKeyBits 768 LoginGraceTime 600 KeyRegenerationInterval 7200 PermitRootLogin yes IgnoreRhosts no StrictModes yes QuietMode no X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 FascistLogging no PrintMotd yes KeepAlive yes SyslogFacility DAEMON RhostsAuthentication yes RhostsRSAAuthent...

...ow_tcp_forwarding = -1; options->num_allow_users = 0; options->num_deny_users = 0; *************** *** 210,216 **** sPasswordAuthentication, sKbdInteractiveAuthentication, sListenAddress, sPrintMotd, sIgnoreRhosts, sX11Forwarding, sX11DisplayOffset, sStrictModes, sEmptyPasswd, sRandomSeedFile, sKeepAlives, sCheckMail, ! sUseLogin, sAllowTcpForwarding, sAllowUsers, sDenyUsers, sAllowGroups, sDenyGroups, sIgnoreUserKnownHosts, sCiphers, sMacs, sProtocol, sPidFile, sGatewayPorts, sPubkeyAuthentication, sXAuthLocation, sSubsystem, sMaxStartups, --- 211,217 ---- sPasswordAut...

Would anybody happen to have or know of a patch to make /etc/default/login PATH and SUPATH the default openssh path? We have customized paths for each school of engineering (each have their own customized site bin). This is easily controled with /etc/default/login. The --with-default-path option is too rigid. This is Solaris I am talking about. --mike

...group == -1) + options->chroot_group = 0; if (options->protocol == SSH_PROTO_UNKNOWN) options->protocol = SSH_PROTO_1|SSH_PROTO_2; if (options->gateway_ports == -1) @@ -189,6 +195,7 @@ sPrintMotd, sIgnoreRhosts, sX11Forwarding, sX11DisplayOffset, sStrictModes, sEmptyPasswd, sRandomSeedFile, sKeepAlives, sCheckMail, sUseLogin, sAllowUsers, sDenyUsers, sAllowGroups, sDenyGroups, + sUseChroot, sChrootGroup, sIgnoreUserKnownHosts, sHostDSAKeyFile, sCiphers, sProtocol, sPidFile, sGatewayPorts, sDSAAuthentication, sXAuthLocation, sSubsystem, sMaxStartups } ServerOpCodes; @@ -236...

...ith clearly documented deviations from the standard. --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/Support/RandomNumberGenerator.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ + +// +// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure Whoops! Missed the ruler comment at the top. +namespace { + static cl::opt<unsigned long long> + RandomSeed("rng-seed", cl::value_desc("seed"), + cl::desc("Seed for the random number generator")); namespace and static are redundant. Just use static. http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#static + PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC_SHA1(Password.data(), Password.size(), (un...

Thanks for all the feedback! It seems there is some interest, so I thought I'd try to summarize discussions so far, and provide patches for closer inspection. I'm not sure if patches should end up here or on a different list in this instance, so if I should instead send this to a different list, I'm happy to do so. - Is diversity needed, or are existing protections sufficient? As