search for: randomdata

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "randomdata".

Did you mean: random_data
2016 Dec 19
2
[lld] Treat .openbsd.randomdata as read-only
It is the intention that .openbsd.randomdata sections are made read-only after initialization. The native (ld.bfd based) OpenBSD toolchain accomplishes this by including .openbsd.randomdata into the PT_GNU_RELRO segment. The diff below makes ldd do the same. Index: ELF/Writer.cpp ============================================================...
2016 Dec 20
0
[lld] Treat .openbsd.randomdata as read-only
LGTM On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Mark Kettenis via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It is the intention that .openbsd.randomdata sections are made > read-only after initialization. The native (ld.bfd based) OpenBSD > toolchain accomplishes this by including .openbsd.randomdata into the > PT_GNU_RELRO segment. The diff below makes ldd do the same. > > Index: ELF/Writer.cpp > ===============================...
2016 Dec 20
0
[lld] Treat .openbsd.randomdata as read-only
>> From: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> >> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:08:59 -0600 >> >> LGTM > >Great. I don't have commit access, so it would be great if you could >commit this change for me. > >Just realized that that I should have sent this to llvm-commits >instead. Apologies for that. > >I have some further fixes. Is Phabricator
2010 Dec 24
1
[ANNOUNCE] Samba 4.0.0 alpha 14 "randomdata"
We are proud to a announce another alpha release of Samba 4, alpha 14, codenamed "randomdata". What's new in Samba 4 alpha14 ============================= Samba 4 is the ambitious next version of the Samba suite that is being developed in parallel to the stable 3.x series. The main emphasis in this branch is support for the Active Directory logon protocols used by Windows 2000 a...
2017 Mar 14
2
Please dogfood LLD
...er (and clang as the system > compiler) on the upcoming OpenBSD/arm64. The system is self-hosting > and we've had to fix only a couple of small things in the way we use > the linker to get to this point. All security-related features we > rely on (-pie, -static -pie, W^X, .openbsd.randomdata) seem to work > just fine. So I'd say AArch64 is defenitely there. > Out of curiosity, what's the story about architectures other than AArch64? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20...
2014 May 07
0
Urgent Problem with failed new User Login to computers on Samba AD Domain
Hi! I am using a very, very old Samba 4 AD server (Samba 4.0.0alpha14 (randomdata)) on a CentOS release 5.10 (Final) 64 bit server. I have not upgraded to the latest yet because I am not very certain what to do to upgrade it without losing my domain objects, and custom scripts. It has been working OK so far until today. (Any tips on how to upgrade without losing everything on i...
2017 Mar 14
10
Please dogfood LLD
Hi all, LLVM 4.0.0 is out, and I can say that LLD/ELF is now ready for production use at least for x86-64 (and probably for AArch64 and MIPS). I believe you've heard a few good news about the linker -- it just works <http://lld.llvm.org/#features> and is very fast <http://lld.llvm.org/#performance>, clean, compact and supported by the active community. I don't think I need to