search for: rams

After fresh installation of CentOS 6.2 on my server, I get following errors in my dmesg output: ------- MTRR default type: uncachable MTRR fixed ranges enabled: 00000-9FFFF write-back A0000-BFFFF uncachable C0000-D7FFF write-protect D8000-E7FFF uncachable E8000-FFFFF write-protect MTRR variable ranges enabled: 0 base 000000000 mask C00000000 write-back 1 base 400000000 mask

Good Day All, Today I looked at the dmesg log and I notice that the following messages regarding mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size. I am currently running CentOS 6.3 and I installed CentOS 6.2 and 6.1 and I was seeing the same errors. When I installed CentOS 5.8 on the same laptop I do not see these errors. $ lsb_release -a LSB Version:

Hi, I have server that has been running 5.x - 5.8 for a few years without issue and decided to move it to a fresh install of 6.2. First thing I noticed is a good part of the log has these mtrr messages finally ending with "mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value" and "please specify mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size". I have been searching around and reading the kernel docs

Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <nouveau at spliet.org> Tested-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ram.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ram.h

Patch 1 fixes nva3 bailing due to not finding the right ramcfg Patch 2 is a resend rebased on 3.17.0-rc4 for setting the vblank period Patch 3-5 handle writes to per-partition registers, for which NVA3 does not have special broadcast regs available. Patch 6 removes local structs from NVA3 reclocking in favour of the already existing "ram->base." variables, like in NVE0 As always,

Following a series of patches that implement memory reclocking for NVA3/5/8 with DDR2, DDR3 and GDDR3 on board. I tested these patches on 6 different graphics cards, but I expect reclocking now to work on many more. Testers can pick up these patches and test it by enabling pstate (nouveau.pstate=1). They should then be able to change clocks by writing to /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pstate. Correct

No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+ - Timing calculation for Fermi - GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that pesky GT 240. - A routine to translate a VBIOS init

My BIOS shows all my RAM, but when I boot up linux it does not see all the RAM I have two one GIG sticks of RAM, which show up in my bios, but when typing free, I see that it only shows 256Megs. Is there a way to specify the amount of RAM if linux cannot detect this, or how can I fix/tweak the OS to recognize the amount of RAM my OS is centos-4-x86_64 on a DELL 1850 [root at smtcorav02 ~ ]#

Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. This patch adds a few conditionals in places where a RAM device was assumed to be present and allows some more objects to be

Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. This patch adds a few conditionals in places where a RAM device was assumed to be present and allows some more objects to be

Hi all i have a rhel5 server with 3GB of RAM and 4 xen guests running: - 1 Windows 2003 + Citrix PS 4.5 with 1 GB - 2 Rhel5 guests with cluster suite and GFS with 640 MB of ram in each one - 1 rhel5 guest with 512 MB of RAM Total: 2.816 MB of RAM Dom0 "only have" 256 MB of ram. Is sufficient or do I need to assign more RAM on dom0? For guests, this ram is sufficient

Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. This patch adds a few conditionals in places where a RAM device was assumed to be present and allows some more objects to be

Hello, Attached a small patch that correctly identifies the DLLoff bit for >=GF100. Marked RFC because I haven't seen any GDDR5 samples that *enable* the DLL. I'd like to verify whether the DLL should be reset when enabled. Could increase likelihood of succesfull reclock. Ben: could you do some experiments with this bit to see if GDDR5 needs some DLL reset logic? Thanks, and happy

Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/bios/ramcfg.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/rammap.c | 3 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/timing.c | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/gddr3.c | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have > no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far > works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for > the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. > > This patch

Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise. Original message: No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern

virtio-mem adds memory in memory block granularity, to be able to remove it in the same granularity again later, and to grow slowly on demand. This, however, results in quite a lot of resources when adding a lot of memory. Resources are effectively stored in a list-based tree. Having a lot of resources not only wastes memory, it also makes traversing that tree more expensive, and makes /proc/iomem

Hello, I hope I am doing this correctly, though I am not sure if a response will be posted somewhere or if I will get a direct response. I am trying to import a .txt table in my class on R and for some reason, the header gets altered and I can no longer read the data. No one in my class had this problem and the instructors were not sure how to fix it. Here is the text table: Kind

Merges in skeggsb's: "fb/ram/gf10x: timing_10_0e_30" Todo: - find l3, rq - triple-check Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <nouveau at spliet.org> --- .../drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/bios/ramcfg.h | 12 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/rammap.c | 22 ++++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/timing.c | 2 +

Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Makefile | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/gddr3.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/priv.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/gddr3.c diff --git