search for: rame_num

...t. > Element 0 should be 4 instead of 0 and last four elements should > be -1 instead of 0 to make it compatible with speex_mode_query() > return values. So, for now I declared own version of wb_skip_table[]. I'll need to have a closer look at that code. > I also think that having rame_num.c in libspeex, code size could be > reduced and simplified slightly by using speex_skip_wb_frame() in > nb_decode() instead of duplicating code. Well, the code is a bit different (e.g. handling of in-band data), so I'm not sure it's possible in a way that is worth it. > You defin...

Hi Alexander, > Here is first attempt. I'm sending it here for review - am I understand > you correctly? If general approach is correct, I'll change code to use > modes from modes.c. I haven't tested, but it looks sane. Just a few comments: - printf("\tERROR not enough bits left after wb\n"); this is actually now an error. It just means you got to the end of the

...version of wb_skip_table[] (nb_celp.c:1081) does not seem to be correct. Element 0 should be 4 instead of 0 and last four elements should be -1 instead of 0 to make it compatible with speex_mode_query() return values. So, for now I declared own version of wb_skip_table[]. I also think that having rame_num.c in libspeex, code size could be reduced and simplified slightly by using speex_skip_wb_frame() in nb_decode() instead of duplicating code. >> One question - as far as I understand, to get number of samples >> we should not parse WB frames even in (U)WB mode, becuase >> in WB mo...

For clarity I attached modified testenc.c I used to test my code. On 2/14/08, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > I also think that having rame_num.c in libspeex, code size could be > > reduced and simplified slightly by using speex_skip_wb_frame() in > > nb_decode() instead of duplicating code. > > Well, the code is a bit different (e.g. handling of in-band data), so > I'm not sure it's possible in a way that is w...