search for: ramaining

..., by=as.list(setdiff(names(x),"Quantity")), sum) Error in FUN(X[[1L]], ...) : arguments must have same length The way I understand it is that 'aggegate' should group the rows that are the same (in the above 1,2 are the same and 3 stands alone) and the FUN should be applied to the ramaining column. I was expecting a data.frame like: Name Category Quantity 1 A a 3 2 C b 3 But that is not what I got. Would someone be so kind as pointing out what I am doing wrong? Thank you. Kevin

...) in my program with different y and x. When one of the nls() encounter a problem, the whole program stops. In my case, the 3rd nls() runs into a problem. I would still need the program to run the remaining 217 nls( )! Is there a way to make the program skip the problematic nls() and complete the ramaining nls()'s? Your help will be highly appreciated! Yuchen Luo [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ort will be removed probably in RHEL 8. I have no idea how it'll >>> affect >>> CentOS kernels though. It will remain in Fedora kernels. >> >> >> That would suck badly to the point at which I?d have to look for yet another >> distribution. The only one ramaining is arch. >> >> What do they suggest as a replacement? The only other FS that comes close >> is >> ZFS, and removing btrfs alltogether would be taking living in the past too >> many >> steps too far. > > Red Hat are working on a new user space wrapper and v...

...to an existing XFS-formatted boot volume and mount your old btrfs data volume? I guess ?yes.? I suspect you?ll even be able to manually create new btrfs data volumes in EL8. >> That would suck badly to the point at which I?d have to look for yet another >> distribution. The only one ramaining is arch. openSUSE defaults to btrfs on root, though XFS on /home for some reason: https://goo.gl/Hiuzbu >> What do they suggest as a replacement? Stratis: https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf The main downside to Stratis I see is that it looks like 1.0 is sched...

...ouncement. >> Support will be removed probably in RHEL 8. I have no idea how it'll >> affect >> CentOS kernels though. It will remain in Fedora kernels. > > > That would suck badly to the point at which I?d have to look for yet another > distribution. The only one ramaining is arch. > > What do they suggest as a replacement? The only other FS that comes close > is > ZFS, and removing btrfs alltogether would be taking living in the past too > many > steps too far. Red Hat are working on a new user space wrapper and volume format based on md, device...

To be honest, I'd not try a btrfs volume on a notebook SSD. I did that on a couple of systems and it corrupted pretty quickly. I'd stick with xfs/ext4 if you manage to get the drive working again. <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com