search for: ram_exec

...nvkm/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c b/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c index ef91b6e..e5d12c2 100644 --- a/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c +++ b/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ nv50_ram_prog(struct nouveau_fb *pfb) struct nv50_ram *ram = (void *)pfb->ram; struct nv50_ramseq *hwsq = &ram->hwsq; - ram_exec(hwsq, nouveau_boolopt(device->cfgopt, "NvMemExec", false)); + ram_exec(hwsq, nouveau_boolopt(device->cfgopt, "NvMemExec", true)); return 0; } diff --git a/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramnva3.c b/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramnva3.c index 6eb97f1..8076fb1 100644 --- a/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramnva3.c...

...amgf100.c index 772425c..a3219a2 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c +++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ gf100_ram_prog(struct nvkm_ram *base) { struct gf100_ram *ram = gf100_ram(base); struct nvkm_device *device = ram->base.fb->subdev.device; - ram_exec(&ram->fuc, nvkm_boolopt(device->cfgopt, "NvMemExec", true)); + ram_exec(&ram->fuc, nvkm_boolopt(device->cfgopt, "NvMemExec", false)); return 0; } -- 2.5.3

...amfuc *ram) nvkm_memx_unblock(ram->memx); } +static inline void +ramfuc_init_run(struct ramfuc *ram, struct nvkm_bios *bios, u16 offset, + u8 ramcfg) +{ + nvkm_memx_init_run(ram->memx, bios, offset, ramcfg); +} + #define ram_init(s,p) ramfuc_init(&(s)->base, (p)) #define ram_exec(s,e) ramfuc_exec(&(s)->base, (e)) #define ram_have(s,r) ((s)->r_##r.addr != 0x000000) @@ -174,4 +181,5 @@ ramfuc_unblock(struct ramfuc *ram) #define ram_train_result(s,r,l) ramfuc_train_result((s), (r), (l)) #define ram_block(s) ramfuc_block(&(s)->base) #d...

...train->r_111400); + ram_nuke(fuc, 0x100080); + ram_mask(fuc, 0x100080, 0x00000020, 0x00000020); + ram_nsec(fuc, 1000); + + ram_wr32(fuc, 0x001700, r1700); + ram_mask(fuc, 0x001610, 0x00000083, 0x00000080); + ram_wr32(fuc, 0x611200, 0x3330); + ram_mask(fuc, 0x100200, 0x00000800, 0x00000800); + + ram_exec(fuc, true); + + ram->base.calc(pfb, clk_current); + ram_exec(fuc, true); + + /* Post-processing, avoids flicker */ + nv_mask(pfb, 0x616308, 0x10, 0x10); + nv_mask(pfb, 0x616b08, 0x10, 0x10); + + nva3_clock_post(clk, f); + + ram_train_result(pfb, result, 64); + for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) + nv_d...

...emx); } +static inline void +ramfuc_fb_disable(struct ramfuc *ram) +{ + nouveau_memx_fb_disable(ram->memx); +} + +static inline void +ramfuc_fb_enable(struct ramfuc *ram) +{ + nouveau_memx_fb_enable(ram->memx); +} + #define ram_init(s,p) ramfuc_init(&(s)->base, (p)) #define ram_exec(s,e) ramfuc_exec(&(s)->base, (e)) #define ram_have(s,r) ((s)->r_##r.addr[0] != 0x000000) @@ -121,5 +133,7 @@ ramfuc_wait_vblank(struct ramfuc *ram) #define ram_wait(s,r,m,d,n) ramfuc_wait(&(s)->base, (r), (m), (d), (n)) #define ram_nsec(s,n) ramfuc_nsec(&am...

Following a series of patches that implement memory reclocking for NVA3/5/8 with DDR2, DDR3 and GDDR3 on board. I tested these patches on 6 different graphics cards, but I expect reclocking now to work on many more. Testers can pick up these patches and test it by enabling pstate (nouveau.pstate=1). They should then be able to change clocks by writing to /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pstate. Correct

Patch 1 and 2 implement wait-for-vblank, required to remove flicker when reclocking memory Patch 3 and 4 allow me to do things between waiting for VBLANK and disabling FB, like pause PFIFO and wait for the engines to idle. This minimises the time PFIFO is paused, thus maximises performance. The rest of the patches speak for themselves. As the actual memory reclocking script is still somewhat prone

...gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c index 7904fa4..8bf4638 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c @@ -1257,144 +1257,6 @@ gk104_ram_tidy(struct nvkm_ram *base) ram_exec(&ram->fuc, false); } -struct gk104_ram_train { - u16 mask; - struct nvbios_M0209S remap; - struct nvbios_M0209S type00; - struct nvbios_M0209S type01; - struct nvbios_M0209S type04; - struct nvbios_M0209S type06; - struct nvbios_M0209S type07; - struct nvbios_M0209S type08; - struct nvbio...

Patch 1 fixes nva3 bailing due to not finding the right ramcfg Patch 2 is a resend rebased on 3.17.0-rc4 for setting the vblank period Patch 3-5 handle writes to per-partition registers, for which NVA3 does not have special broadcast regs available. Patch 6 removes local structs from NVA3 reclocking in favour of the already existing "ram->base." variables, like in NVE0 As always,

No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+ - Timing calculation for Fermi - GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that pesky GT 240. - A routine to translate a VBIOS init

Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise. Original message: No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern

...rivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c index c7fdb3a..6ce518d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c @@ -223,37 +223,6 @@ nv50_ram_tidy(struct nouveau_fb *pfb) ram_exec(hwsq, false); } -void -__nv50_ram_put(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, struct nouveau_mem *mem) -{ - struct nouveau_mm_node *this; - - while (!list_empty(&mem->regions)) { - this = list_first_entry(&mem->regions, typeof(*this), rl_entry); - - list_del(&this->rl_entry); - nouveau_m...