search for: raising_the_functional_level

...ional level as it currently returns: Forest function level: (Windows) 2000 Domain function level: (Windows) 2000 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2000 There is only a single DC (this host). According to the documentation 2000 isn’t even supported anymore: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels> <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels> Any attempt to raise the level with samba-tool returns: Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function level of a DC! The fsmo rol...

...t; Forest function level: (Windows) 2000 > Domain function level: (Windows) 2000 > Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2000 > > There is only a single DC (this host). > > According to the documentation 2000 isn’t even supported anymore: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels > <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels> > > <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels> > Any attempt to raise the level with samba-tool returns: > > Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function...

...doesn't provide the capabilities yet, you may know from Windows. I mentioned the pitfalls in a 'known issues' section and of course I've reported the incompatibilities/bugs (#10371 and #10403) Out of this HowTo a small second one has been risen: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_functional_levels (Also found a problem here, when raising the levels from Windows: #10360) Any kind of feedback is welcome. :-) Regards, Marc

Dear all, My , samba-tool domain level show shows me it is W2003: [root at s4master ~]# samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=tplk,DC=loc' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 Can I raise without issues to W 2008 R2? Or should I stay with 2003? Greetings

...umbled across the domain Functionality Level which if I understand means that I have to increase it from 2003 to 2008 in order to be able to allow this. Is this true, do I have to upgrade the level, or am I just missing the way to achieve the above? I see that ... https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_functional_levels#Impact_of_upgrading_the_functional_levels ...talks about the ensuring that your forest level isn't higher than your domain level so I'll set them both to 2008 functionality, and I presume that if I increase this on my PDC I'll need to increase it on my other Samba4 domain controller...

...            The forest function level (2003 | 2008 | 2008_R2 |                         2012 | 2012_R2)   --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL                         The domain function level (2003 | 2008 | 2008_R2 |                         2012 | 2012_R2) I see in wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels but dont understan.... * Functional level is included for use against Windows, but not supported in Samba. Kerberos improvements from Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are not implemented in Samba. 1° - Dont have Windows Server, samba 4(3 Dcs) is ok up(update) FOREST_LEVEL/DOMAIN_LEVEL , 2008...

...information available seems to indicate that the reason for this is due to changes within the Windows Server Kerberos services, that are possibly not available within MIT or Heimdal Kerberos? Has anyone within the community had experience with this? References: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux.samba/kAbGkR4CGLg 1 https://docs.microsoft.com/cs-cz/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/active-directory-functional-levels I would be most grateful for any guidance and feedback, if possible please. Kind regards, David Wilson

El 12/06/15 a les 14:47, joseph-andre Guaragna ha escrit: > official documentation on samba describe this situation: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_functional_levels > Meilleures salutations / Best regards, There's also this issue: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-July/174639.html (even if time synchronization seems to work fine). Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es Tel. +34 935883004 Fax +34 935883007

...erent thing to your server functional level, > so you can keep the domain functional level at 2008R2, which is what > Samba has reasonable support for. As this week I also looked into the functional levels that samba supports, I must say that this wiki page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels looks as if samba 4.4 and later support 2012_R2. I understand that this is not the case, but I feel that the info on the wiki is (at least) confusing. (or even plain wrong) MJ

G'day All, We are trying to raise the level of our test samba4 DCs. Our windows dude wants the Domain level to be 2012_R2. I am referencing: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels We managed to get both domain and forest levels to 2008 R2 - forest was 2003. However, when we try to raise further, we are getting what seems to be a chicken and egg issue. # samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2012_R2 ERROR: Domain function level can...

...e forest function level (2003 | 2008 | >> 2008_R2 | 2012 | 2012_R2) >>   --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL >>                         The domain function level (2003 | 2008 | >> 2008_R2 | 2012 | 2012_R2) >> >> I see in wiki >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels >> >> but dont understan.... >> >> * Functional level is included for use against Windows, but not >> supported in Samba. Kerberos improvements from Windows Server 2012 >> and 2012 R2 are not implemented in Samba. >> >> 1° - Dont have Windows Server,...

Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise - mainstream support end-date: 1/13/2015 - extended support end-date: 1/14/2020 samba -V Version 4.6.0rc2 samba-tool domain level show ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=facility,DC=local' Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of a DC:

Hello Andrew, first let me say it was a pleasure to meet you in G?ttingen at the SambaXP. The discussion about the "DNS" in the evening was very interesting. So, i have asked this question a few weeks before, maybe a entry in the samba wiki would help ;) Regards from Germany Dirk Am 13.06.19 um 18:55 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba: > On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 20:48 +0530,

I am planning to upgrade the DCs using the join and promote method. List of DCs ----------- 1) SAMBA1 2) SAMBA2 3) DC1 4) DC2 Currently SAMBA1 is the PDC and SAMBA2 is the "SDC" and are in sync with replication and rsync sysvol. DCs SAMBA1 and SAMBA2 are 4.1 git releases with AD Schema version 47. My plan to get to AD Schema version 69 was... 0. Add entries to the DHCP Server for the

...the lowest function > level of a DC! > > # samba-tool domain level raise --forest-level 2012_R2 ldb_wrap open > of secrets.ldb > ERROR: Forest function level can't be higher than the domain function > level(s). Please raise it/them first! https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels What do you need the 2012_R2 level for? Regards, Marc -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

...D with Azure/O365. Currently, this only seems possible from Win DCs (please do correct me if this information is not accurate) which is why it may become necessary to install one. However, with version 2008 approaching EOL, this may become a critical issue. (1) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels (2) https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/active-directory-functional-levels (3) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2012_/_2012_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD Viktor

...;                         The forest function level (2003 | 2008 | > 2008_R2 | 2012 | 2012_R2) >   --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL >                         The domain function level (2003 | 2008 | > 2008_R2 | 2012 | 2012_R2) > > I see in wiki > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels > > but dont understan.... > > * Functional level is included for use against Windows, but not > supported in Samba. Kerberos improvements from Windows Server 2012 > and 2012 R2 are not implemented in Samba. > > 1° - Dont have Windows Server, samba 4(3 Dcs) is ok up(upd...

...information available seems to indicate that the reason for this is due to changes within the Windows Server Kerberos services, that are possibly not available within MIT or Heimdal Kerberos? Has anyone within the community had experience with this? References: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux.samba/kAbGkR4CGLg 1 https://docs.microsoft.com/cs-cz/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/active-directory-functional-levels I would be most grateful for any guidance and feedback, if possible please. Kind regards, David Wilson -- To unsubscribe f...

...;> level of a DC! >> >> # samba-tool domain level raise --forest-level 2012_R2 ldb_wrap open >> of secrets.ldb >> ERROR: Forest function level can't be higher than the domain function >> level(s). Please raise it/them first! > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels > > What do you need the 2012_R2 level for? > > > Regards, > Marc > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > >

Hello Andrew, totally backup. There is an entry in the wiki. I have overlook the side ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels). My fault, sorry :-[ Regards Dirk Am 13.06.19 um 19:13 schrieb Dirk Streubel via samba: > Hello Andrew, > > first let me say it was a pleasure to meet you in G?ttingen at the SambaXP. > > The discussion about the "DNS" in the evening was ve...