search for: raising

Hi, Yesterday, I’ve landed a description for how reported bugs should be flowing through the various stages of a bug’s life (triage, fixing, closing, …) at http://llvm.org/docs/BugLifeCycle.html. Thanks for the many many people who provided ideas and feedback for this! With there now being a description of what is expected during bug triaging

Hi Zach, Thanks for putting the data in a spreadsheet - that’s easier to navigate. And thanks for re-raising the question whether we have the right components in bugzilla. As I think this could be an area for lots of different opinions, without any near-perfect solution, it has the potential to be a discussion that drags on for a long time. I thought half of all bugs not getting triaged was a serious enou...

...he right person to talk to is in each case. Anyway, just my thoughts. On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:19 AM Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com<mailto:Kristof.Beyls at arm.com>> wrote: Hi Zach, Thanks for putting the data in a spreadsheet - that’s easier to navigate. And thanks for re-raising the question whether we have the right components in bugzilla. As I think this could be an area for lots of different opinions, without any near-perfect solution, it has the potential to be a discussion that drags on for a long time. I thought half of all bugs not getting triaged was a serious enou...

...y thoughts. >> >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:19 AM Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Zach, >>> >>> Thanks for putting the data in a spreadsheet - that’s easier to navigate. >>> >>> And thanks for re-raising the question whether we have the right >>> components in bugzilla. >>> As I think this could be an area for lots of different opinions, without >>> any near-perfect solution, it has the potential to be a discussion that >>> drags on for a long time. >>>...

Hi folks, I''m in the process of converting a Test::Unit functional test to RSpec, but I''ve run into a slight problem. I tried looking through the documentation but I still don''t know what I missed. Thanks in advance, Blake describe VenuesController, "on update" do before(:each) do @venue = mock("venue")

...o raise the forest level I get an error - > "Forest > function level can't be higher than the domain function level(s). > Please > raise it/them first!". > > From this what I understand is we have to first raise the lowest > functional level to 2012 R2 before raising domain level and finally > raise the forest level. > > But how do we raise the lowest function level using samba-tool or > Active > Directory Domains and Trusts tool? I am not able to find any > reference > or documentation. Or do we have to set it while provisioning the DC...

...el of a DC!" and when I try to raise the forest level I get an error - "Forest function level can't be higher than the domain function level(s). Please raise it/them first!". From this what I understand is we have to first raise the lowest functional level to 2012 R2 before raising domain level and finally raise the forest level. But how do we raise the lowest function level using samba-tool or Active Directory Domains and Trusts tool? I am not able to find any reference or documentation. Or do we have to set it while provisioning the DC? -- Thanks & Regards, Anan...

...I get an error - >> "Forest >> function level can't be higher than the domain function level(s). >> Please >> raise it/them first!". >> >> From this what I understand is we have to first raise the lowest >> functional level to 2012 R2 before raising domain level and finally >> raise the forest level. >> >> But how do we raise the lowest function level using samba-tool or >> Active >> Directory Domains and Trusts tool? I am not able to find any >> reference >> or documentation. Or do we have to set it w...

First off, I love mocha and have been using it all over the place ever since I found it a few months ago. So I noticed the other day rather belatedly that mocha-0.4.0 had been released and that we can now do the object.stubs(:method).returns (:first_value, :second_value). Much neater than fiddling with lambdas everytime this sort of behaviour is needed But can we go further ? I was

Hi there, I''m using Log4r in my rails projects. On log.error an email is sent using the EmailOutputter. I know changed the EmailOutputter to include a global var in the subject (MDC) since the subject is normally static. I want to set this var to the exception message, so it is sent as the subject. Can anyone tell me how to do this in rails? Basically: raise e or some other cause

...ad blocked in pthread_join). This makes sense given that raise() only promises to target the process, not a given thread. Would it be possible to add an equivalent to lwp_kill() that specifically targets a thread? (I also tried setting a watchpoint using procfs, but copyout errors out instead of raising the thread-specific SIGTRAP I had hoped for...) Thanks, Ryan -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

...--ipaddress=IPADDRESS IP address of server Version Options: --version Display version number and when I'm trying to raise the forest level the tools says that the domain functional level needs to be raised first. What's the proper way of raising the functional level in recent git is ? Regards Arek

Was hoping it might get some help or a better explanation of this: /ADT/APInt.h:1217: uint64_t llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const: Assertion `getActiveBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for uint64_t"' failed. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x00007ffff6eb4d05 in raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 64

G'day All, We are trying to raise the level of our test samba4 DCs. Our windows dude wants the Domain level to be 2012_R2. I am referencing: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels We managed to get both domain and forest levels to 2008 R2 - forest was 2003. However, when we try to raise further, we are getting what seems to be a chicken and egg issue. # samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2012_R2 ERROR: Domain...

With : PostgreSQL 8.4 or postgresql-8.3 rails 2.3.4 pg 9.x or pg 8.x I test this code: ========================= class NkiBatch < ActiveRecord::Base Bank.connection.transaction do bank = Bank.new(:name => "ddsjdsjdsjk") bank.save! raise ActiveRecord::Rollback.new end end and this: ========================= class NkiBatch < ActiveRecord::Base

Hi, today I updated my DC debian 12 to samba 4.19rc2 from mjt repository and I tried to increase feature level of domain but failed. First 2 commands was ok: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019 samba-tool domain functionalprep --function-level=2016 the third instead failed: > samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2016 --forest-level=2016 > ERROR(<class

...l/128 https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/129 Also note the mention of the new Python module here: https://github.com/george2/python-nut2/tree/development - Charles Begin forwarded message: > From: george2 <notifications at github.com> > Subject: [nut] PyNUT: Fix error when raising without an Exception. (#128) > Date: June 3, 2014 3:34:00 PM EDT > Raising without a valid exception is invalid: > > >>> raise > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > TypeError: exceptions must be old-style...

Hi, have permanent failure when try to create VDI on local SR type=file or type=ext. On both types it failed with the same error: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_78 VDI Creation failed [opterr=error 127] I am on Debian box with kernel 3.3.0-rc7, Xen version 4.1.2 (Debian 4.1.2-2.1), Xen-API Version: 1.3.2-4 (Kronos) Is it a bug, or am I missing something? Anybody managed to workaround this problem? Here is

Hi all, any body can tell me why i am receiving this message in my sever ? I have running * with 10 Digital Lines, but i am receiving a lot of times this message . Is a software issue or is a hardware issue ? Regards. Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:2672 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 event Alarm Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3091 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 Alarm masks

Hello, Is anyone else having trouble with the and_raise method on mocks, with respect to shared behaviors? If I do the following instead: foo.should_receive(:bar).and_return { raise } everything seems to work. I have been supplying no arguments to and_raise, by the way. Also, you may want to make the background in the code examples on the home page a little lighter. I am hardly able to