Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "raidzn".
Did you mean:
raidz2
2010 Oct 17
10
RaidzN blocksize ... or blocksize in general ... and resilver
The default blocksize is 128K. If you are using mirrors, then each block on
disk will be 128K whenever possible. But if you''re using raidzN with a
capacity of M disks (M disks useful capacity + N disks redundancy) then the
block size on each individual disk will be 128K / M. Right? This is one of
the reasons the raidzN resilver code is inefficient. Since you end up
waiting for the slowest seek time of any one disk in the vdev, and w...
2007 May 30
0
RAIDZn+1 (related to the h/w raid ponderings)
...rays in a pair is out of service for an extended
time, the remaining array can still withstand a drive failure.
Well, I''d like to get rid of that hardware RAID5 and use RAIDz... but
then that would preclude my mirroring setup from happening since I
can''t set up two distinct RAIDZn sets within a pool and mirror them.
For those familiar with ZFS internals, could a "RAIDZ+1"
configuration be a distinct possibility?
/dale
2012 Jan 15
22
Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot? If yes - how?
"Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot?"
That''s a kind of radical, possibly offensive, question formula
that I have lately.
Reading up on theory of RAID5, I grasped the idea of the write
hole (where one of the sectors of the stripe, such as the parity
data, doesn''t get written - le...
2006 Sep 28
13
jbod questions
Folks,
We are in the process of purchasing new san/s that our mail server
runs on (JES3). We have moved our mailstores to zfs and continue to
have checksum errors -- they are corrected but this improves on the
ufs inode errors that require system shutdown and fsck.
So, I am recommending that we buy small jbods, do raidz2 and let zfs
handle the raiding of these boxes. As we need more
2010 Oct 20
5
Myth? 21 disk raidz3: "Don''t put more than ___ disks in a vdev"
In a discussion a few weeks back, it was mentioned that the Best Practices
Guide says something like "Don''t put more than ___ disks into a single
vdev." At first, I challenged this idea, because I see no reason why a
21-disk raidz3 would be bad. It seems like a good thing.
I was operating on assumption that resilver time was limited by sustainable
throughput of disks, which
2012 Nov 30
13
Remove disk
Hi all,
I would like to knwon if with ZFS it''s possible to do something like that :
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/removeadisk.html
meaning :
I have a zpool with 48 disks with 4 raidz2 (12 disk). Inside those 48 disk
I''ve 36x 3T and 12 x 2T.
Can I buy new 12x4 To disk put in the server, add in the zpool, ask zpool
to migrate all data on those 12 old disk on the new and
2010 Oct 16
4
resilver question
Hi all
I''m seeing some rather bad resilver times for a pool of WD Green drives (I know, bad drives, but leave that). Does resilver go through the whole pool or just the VDEV in question?
--
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy at karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
2010 Dec 10
5
Large Drives
The time has come to expand my OpenSolaris NAS.
Right now I have 6 1TB Samsung Spinpoints in a Raidz2 configuration. I also have a mirrored root pool.
The Raidz2 configuration should be for my most critical data - but right now it is holding everything so I need to add some more pools and move some data around.
To start I need a vdev I will call "temp" that acts as a networked bit
2012 Jan 07
14
zfs defragmentation via resilvering?
Hello all,
I understand that relatively high fragmentation is inherent
to ZFS due to its COW and possible intermixing of metadata
and data blocks (of which metadata path blocks are likely
to expire and get freed relatively quickly).
I believe it was sometimes implied on this list that such
fragmentation for "static" data can be currently combatted
only by zfs send-ing existing
2012 Dec 20
3
Pool performance when nearly full
Hi
I know some of this has been discussed in the past but I can''t quite find the exact information I''m seeking
(and I''d check the ZFS wikis but the websites are down at the moment).
Firstly, which is correct, free space shown by "zfs list" or by "zpool iostat" ?
zfs list:
used 50.3 TB, free 13.7 TB, total = 64 TB, free = 21.4%
zpool iostat:
used
2009 Dec 06
20
Accidentally added disk instead of attaching
Hi,
I wanted to add a disk to the tank pool to create a mirror. I accidentally used zpool add ? instead of zpool attach ? and now the disk is added. Is there a way to remove the disk without loosing data? Or maybe change it to mirror?
Thanks,
Martijn
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2010 Mar 26
23
RAID10
Hi All,
I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn''t a RAID 10 setup better for data protection?
So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn''t I:
- mirror drive 1 and 5
- mirror drive 2 and 6
- mirror drive 3 and 7
- mirror drive 4 and 8
Then stripe 1,2,3,4
Then stripe 5,6,7,8
How does one do this with ZFS?