search for: radware

Hi, I am using bind 9.6.0. I want to configure cname for corporate web (example.com). When I mention following my company site opens without sub domain. e.g example.com I dont need to mention www.example.com. @ IN A x.x.x.x I have two ISP with radware link proof. Radware device has its own dns e.g abc.com I have web record on link proof e.g www.abc.com (ip x.x.x.1 & y.y.y.1) Now when I am trying to configure following my domain doesn't resolve. @ IN CNAME www.abc.com. OR example.com. IN CNAME www.abc.com. Kindly guide me to create...

...ovider). I have about 700-1000 concurrent imap connections. I have storage in nfs (nfsv3, the nfs server is a celerra), but indexes are in local filesystems (each server has its own index fs). Mailboxes are in maildir format. Old servers and actual director servers are load balanced with an radware appdirector load balancer (the new backend servers don't need to be balanced because I'm using a director farm) In the old platform I have scenario number 2 described at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS, but in the new ones I have a director proxy directing all connections from each user t...

Hi you all, I''m working on outbound load-balancing between multiple (actually 2) ISPs. Examples given in docs/articles are perfectly working, but I would like to go a bit further. My idea would be to have a "cheap" LinkProof (from Radwar) box, and the major difference between this box and a Linux solution is that a LinkProof can be installed without changing the IP addressing.

...IP address; every asterisk server will have a different RTP port range to avoid rtp conflicts. And, for now, the LB part works manually registering the ops on different asterisk servers. But now we have to achieve the HA part of the setup. We started considering a SIP hardware load balancer, like Radware or Brocade, but neither a single nor a couple of this equipments (HA, remember?) do not fit in the customer budget. So, we started thinking about use OpenSIPS (formerly OpenSER) as a SIP load-balancer. (the customer has server hardware that could be used for this, and we will use VRRP for redundanc...

We have a client that wants to bond 2 DSL circuits instead of getting a T-1 (or similar) at their office to run their VoIP traffic on. We came across this Multihomed Gateway (MH200): http://www.cyberpathinc.com/mh200/details.htm Does anybody think this would work if installed at the client location handling NAT for 10 Cisco 7960's and connecting to our public asterisk server? My concern

Is anyone successfully using some sort of hardware crypto solution to combat the overhead of SSL in http transactions? I'd love to hear anything good or bad about this. -Bill -- -=| Bill Swingle - <unfurl@(dub.net|freebsd.org)> -=| Every message PGP signed -=| PGP Fingerprint: C1E3 49D1 EFC9 3EE0 EA6E 6414 5200 1C95 8E09 0223 -=| "Computers are useless. They can only give you

Hello experts, I tried upgrading libvirt and compiled version 1.1.1 The problem is that when I run "virsh version" I get the following output: Compiled against library: libvirt 1.1.1 Using library: libvirt 1.1.1 Using API: QEMU 1.1.1 Running hypervisor: QEMU 0.12.1 The problem is that it reports that the Running hypervisor is: QEMU 0.12.1 I wanted to upgrade everything to the latest