search for: radioleft

How do people feel about eliminating the list serv in favor of the forum? Or limiting the list serv to news? I have one vendor I work with that has a knowledgebase, a forum, and two mailing lists - with much overlap of topics. It is truly enough to drive you totally crazy. I'm not suggesting anything. Just bringing it up. Geoff

...you will find some kid in your > community who's got or is willing to develop the necessary skills to > keep a linux server running. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:56:26 -0500 > From: Geoff Staples <geoff@radioleft.com> > Subject: [Icecast] Windows or Linux > To: icecast <icecast@xiph.org> > Message-ID: <42C28C6A.6040504@radioleft.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I'd say use Linux for the Icecast server since that is something that &...

Is there some info somewhere about calculating the throughput of an Icecast server? (I'm not really talking about the bandwidth) I need to figure out how much CPU and RAM I need. I also need to know whether other software on the server (such as mySQL ) will have a problem with Icecast. Geoff

There are some rather nice archive replacements for Mailman that provide full searching, etc. I can provide more info if wanted. Geoff

I'm curious about why you would want to run Icecast on port 80. Geoff Justin Bot wrote: >Care to shed some light on this? I have about 10 IPs that are at my >disposal and 3 I've been keeping for spares and whatnot. Though >binding them is a little beyond me. > >TIA > >Justin > >On 6/22/05, Klaas Jan Wierenga <k.j.wierenga@home.nl> wrote: > >

Here's my summary of what might be a consensus: We have two mailing lists (developer and user) We have a forum We will keep both Some prefer the forum, some prefer the listserv Suggestions were maded about using NNTP, IRC, etc., but, I didn't see any support for that. Chestnuts will be copied from the forum into an FAQ as a documentation development technique and for easy access to the

We're looking at selling streaming services to our customers. Right now, we sell Real Media services with our hosting plans. But, we're having more and more requests for a more robust offering. That means more features and control at a better price. We need a wholesale provider with infrastructure tuned specifically to media streaming. We don't care whether it is on dedicated

Interesting. I discussed this off line with a couple of folks and offered to host a forum. -- But, not to run it. So, this is great that we know have it and you have stepped up to the plate to run it. I do have a request / suggestion: I've noticed that many of the boards for open source software suffer from a couple of problems and it would be great if the Icecast forum could rise above

If you are broadcasting the same feed on all three stations, then, you can encode at a high bit rate (FM quality - see the Icecast documentation to decide format and bit rate). Then, use Icecast to serve the feed and your stations can then attach to the feed and receive their signal. You can use authentication, or even an obscure mount name (If it isn't published anywhere, how could

When you set up phpBB, the admin can specify defaults. They include "Make email address private" and "Allow members to receive private messages" The admin would set they defaults to "yes" and "no" respectively. That means the member would have to take an action (change a setting in his profile or on an individual post) for his email address to be

As a national broadcaster, ISDN is definitely NOT cost effective compared to IP based transport. I don't disagree. I'm simply suggesting that digital telephony of one form or another is more reliable and little latency. And, in certain circumstances cheaper than IP. Our friend at the Bible college didn't say whether he's talking about long distance (as in telephone charges)