search for: radioakropoli

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "radioakropoli".

Did you mean: radioakropolis
2004 Aug 06
2
ices2 build errors
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -I/usr/include/libxml2 -pthread -g -O2 -o ices input.o cfgparse.o stream.o ices.o signals.o im_playlist.o reencode.o encode.o playlist_basic.o im_stdinpcm.o stream_shared.o metadata.o playlist_script.o audio.o resample.o im_oss.o log/libicelog.la timing/libicetiming.la thread/libicethread.la avl/libiceavl.la -lvorbisenc -L/usr/local/lib -lshout -lvorbis
2004 Aug 06
0
ambiguity in sample ices config files
...sure that the sample config file will be modified and documentation will be created as well, but Icecast is still in alpha... Programmers don't write documentation ;). We all have to wait. BTW, I'm impatient too :). Stepan Broz, aka Kato ----- mailto:peacef@wo.cz ICQ#:74439855 http://www.radioakropolis.cz/ <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Un...
2004 Aug 06
3
winamp + application/ogg = doh
I am trying to pass an ogg stream through icecast and then from icecast through to winamp. I pass the ogg stream to icecast with the Content-Type = "application/x-ogg" however icecast serves the audio out with Content-Type = "application/ogg" unfortunately winamp seems to only accepts "application/x-ogg" am i missing something, or what's a guy to do? thanks!
2004 Aug 06
3
ambiguity in sample ices config files
[please cc the answers to me, because I'm not on this list!] Hi there! Yesterday I downloaded the CVS version of icecast and ices. There are several example config files provided for ices in the conf/ directory. The ices-playlist.xml specifies encoding for one of the instances: <encode> <nominal-bitrate>64000</nominal-bitrate>
2004 Aug 06
4
Asymmetric load balancing
I have three Icecast-2.0.0 servers up with possibly more coming online. I am trying to figure out how to do more intelligent load balancing between the three. Problem: There are bandwidth restrictions at a couple of the locations. Current Solution: Round-robin DNS (with very low TTL) and a restriction on the number of listeners on the servers where bandwidth is an issue. I am finding this