search for: radics

I have created a scaffold Admin/Radicals for doing CRUD. However, I''m not sure exactly where the scaffold uses the save() method. For a new entry, it creates form "radical" referencing method create(). The code for create() is as follows: def create @radical = Radical.new(params[:radical]) if @radical.save flash[:notice] = ''Radical was

OK, I''ve been putting off this question for a while now, but it eating at me, so I can''t hold off any more. I have a nice 8 gig memory stick I''ve formated with the ZFS file system. Works great on all my Solaris PC''s, but refuses to work on my Sparc processor. So I''ve formated it on my Sparc machine (Blade 2500), works great there now, but not on

Creating looped pulldowns in PHP is simple so I can''t figure out why it seems to elude me in RoR. I want to create a simple pulldown list with the options and values "1" through "14." I have been trying to accomplish this with the .upto method like so: --START RHTML CODE-- <% options_array = [ 1.upto(14) {|i| print "[" i "," i "]"}

Hi Friends, At present, I am using VoIPJET.COM provider for make calls to USA. I have two doubts. 1) I am unable to make call to UK Mobile phone. Why? 2) I want to make calls to "Turkey" country from "India". With VoIPJET, I am unable to make call to "Turkey" and unable to find VoIP provider for Turkey. Please tell me VoIP Provider for Turkey from India.

(Sorry for CC'ing piles of people, but didn't want folks to miss this in the mailing list churn.) See the subject. The problem is in the target-independent code generator and especially in the x86 backend. I would like to fix it. This will be a mechanical change just organizing code in a way that makes it easy and fast to find methods and related static helpers. It will not change any

Today I updated the firmware on my StorageTek 2540 to the latest recommended version and am seeing radically difference performance when testing with iozone than I did in February of 2008. I am using Solaris 10 U5 with all the latest patches. This is the performance achieved (on a 32GB file) in February last year: KB reclen write rewrite read reread 33554432

First I would like to say thank you to HPA for providing some really nice features in recently syslinux version. About new functions, actually I have another radical idea, since we are in Asia, most of the users here they would like to see some local fonts for the syslinux/pxelinux menu. I am wondering is that possible, in the future, the syslinux/pxelinux menu can support CJK fonts or icon ?

Hi all, I was trying to plot a graph using the following data: method percent accuracy group A1 4 0.8529 cns A1 10 0.8412 cns A1 15 0.8235 cns A2 4 0.9353 cns A2 10 0.9412 cns A2 15 0.9471 cns A1 4 0.8323 col A1 10 0.8452 col A1 15 0.8484 col A2 4 0.8839 col A2 10 0.8677 col A2 15 0.8678 col ################# The code I'm using to generate the graphs is: ### code :

Hello, there is a way with a sieve rule to add a Date: header when it is missing? Adding one with the time of reception of the message or using the date from the the first Received: header would be good options. Unfortunately I'm receiving some useful automated messages that lack a Date header and this screws up the sorting in my imap clients. I have a script to fix those acting on the

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 15/12/15 10:17 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote: >> Hi All >> >> Is it possible to upgrade from CentOS 6.7 to CentOS 7? >> >> I see there is some attempt at an upgrade tool available, but it's >> apparently broken: >> >>

I have noticed quite a few changes regarding register allocation. I am wondering will there be support for radically different data structures other than the LiveIntervals, Virtual Register Map, etc? I have build a custom data structure which has it's own intermediate representation like live-intervals, but much more conducive for my allocation algorithm. I do not know if LiveIntervals can

Over time, the Wine wiki front page grew rather unwieldy, so I split the developer information off into two new pages, leaving only a simplified front page behind, mostly aimed at users. It's radically simpler. Hopefully it'll be more welcoming to new users. Comments?

Hello, I've inherited a set of servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.9. They have some variant of samba 3.3 on them (e.g. Version 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2). These servers are using Samba and Winbind as a way to bind to our Active Directory environment as domain members. We also have a domain member file server running the following: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6

Hello, Could someone suggest a package/way to make a 3D raster plot of the Earth (with continent boundaries), and then make a "cut" or "slice" of it such that one can also visualize some scalar quantity as a function of the Radius/Depth across that given slice ? Formally, I would have a given, fixed longitude, and a list of vectors {latitude, radius, Value} that would show

I am new to more radical programming in R. I am trying to write a nested 'for' loop to produce output that takes subscripts like: for i taking values 1,2,3,4,5 and j taking values 1,2,3 I want to output for a computation using the combination values of i and j a value x like this; i j x 1 1 x11 1 2 x12 1 3 x13 2 1 x21 2 2 x22 2 3 x23 3 1 x31 3 2 x32

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Lu Mitnick <king19880326 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I want to the do followings: > > (1) Modify the LLVM front-end(clang) to support EFI C > > (2) Add EFI Byte Code target to LLVM > > I am wondering to know which task should I do first, modify front end or > porting LLVM? > > thanks > > yi-hong As long as

no expression parser or knowledge of any specific programming language. Basically I just mean that the parsing of the native DWARF format itself is in scope, but anything beyond that is out of scope. For symbolication we have things like llvm-symbolizer that already just work and are built on top of LLVM's dwarf parsing code. Similarly, LLDB's type system could be built on top of it as

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Richard suggested that since we do time-based rather than > > feature-based releases, the distinction between a release with or > > without major changes is

Hi @ll, a few of us had recently a discussion about how to manage the C API and possible policies regarding addition, maintenance, deprecation, and removal of API. Even thought there is a strong agreement in the community that we shouldn't break released C API and should be backwards compatible, there doesn’t seem to be a developer policy that backs that up. This is something we should fix.

As he wrote that SSH and SMTP auth and others stuffs are working, I would say SSSD should work. As he wrote there is an issue with Samba, I'd like to understand how he is using Samba, what is the exact error and what he's doing to get that error. Samba should be able to live with other tools. We should be able to able to speak here about Samba working with other tools. But that certainly