search for: radically

I have created a scaffold Admin/Radicals for doing CRUD. However, I''m not sure exactly where the scaffold uses the save() method. For a new entry, it creates form "radical" referencing method create(). The code for create() is as follows: def create @radical = Radical.new(params[:radical]) if @radical.save flash[:notice] = ''Radical was

OK, I''ve been putting off this question for a while now, but it eating at me, so I can''t hold off any more. I have a nice 8 gig memory stick I''ve formated with the ZFS file system. Works great on all my Solaris PC''s, but refuses to work on my Sparc processor. So I''ve formated it on my Sparc machine (Blade 2500), works great there now, but not on

Creating looped pulldowns in PHP is simple so I can''t figure out why it seems to elude me in RoR. I want to create a simple pulldown list with the options and values "1" through "14." I have been trying to accomplish this with the .upto method like so: --START RHTML CODE-- <% options_array = [ 1.upto(14) {|i| print "[" i "," i "]"}

...ake call to "Turkey" and unable to find VoIP provider for Turkey. Please tell me VoIP Provider for Turkey from India. Looking forward for your response. Thanks&Regards, Chandramouli --------------------------------- Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060526/4415b8f7/attachment.htm

...find methods and related static helpers. It will not change any actual functionality. But it will pretty much completely break the utility of looking at only a single layer of blame. Fortunately we have nice tools like 'git blame' that can step incrementally back through time. If anyone is radically opposed to me cleaning up TargetLowering.h, TargetLoweringBase.cpp, and X86ISelLowering.{h,cpp}, shout. Otherwise, I will clean this up with a vengence. I've CC'ed piles of folks who are actively contributing and might be seriously impacted to make sure I don't really make life horrible...

Today I updated the firmware on my StorageTek 2540 to the latest recommended version and am seeing radically difference performance when testing with iozone than I did in February of 2008. I am using Solaris 10 U5 with all the latest patches. This is the performance achieved (on a 32GB file) in February last year: KB reclen write rewrite read reread 33554432 64...

First I would like to say thank you to HPA for providing some really nice features in recently syslinux version. About new functions, actually I have another radical idea, since we are in Asia, most of the users here they would like to see some local fonts for the syslinux/pxelinux menu. I am wondering is that possible, in the future, the syslinux/pxelinux menu can support CJK fonts or icon ?

...ii) How can I set the abline feature to show a horizontal line at different points on the y-axis for each of the two graphs? Any help would be highly appreciated. many thanks. --------------------------------- Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...the first Received: header would be good options. Unfortunately I'm receiving some useful automated messages that lack a Date header and this screws up the sorting in my imap clients. I have a script to fix those acting on the Maildir storage, but I would prefer to have the thing solved more radically. Thanks. Cheers, Daniele

...wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool >> >> Would anyone be able to recommend a manual upgrade procedure to >> upgrade a minimal CentOS 6.7 system to one or other version of CentOS >> 7? >> >> Many thanks in advance, >> Traiano > > Given how radically the OS changed, I would strongly advice against it. > The move from sysvinit to systemd alone is enough to recommend against > an upgrade. So it's not possible under any circumstances? > > -- > Digimer > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ > What if the cure for...

I have noticed quite a few changes regarding register allocation. I am wondering will there be support for radically different data structures other than the LiveIntervals, Virtual Register Map, etc? I have build a custom data structure which has it's own intermediate representation like live-intervals, but much more conducive for my allocation algorithm. I do not know if LiveIntervals can accurately describe...

Over time, the Wine wiki front page grew rather unwieldy, so I split the developer information off into two new pages, leaving only a simplified front page behind, mostly aimed at users. It's radically simpler. Hopefully it'll be more welcoming to new users. Comments?

Hello, I've inherited a set of servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.9. They have some variant of samba 3.3 on them (e.g. Version 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2). These servers are using Samba and Winbind as a way to bind to our Active Directory environment as domain members. We also have a domain member file server running the following: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6

Hello, Could someone suggest a package/way to make a 3D raster plot of the Earth (with continent boundaries), and then make a "cut" or "slice" of it such that one can also visualize some scalar quantity as a function of the Radius/Depth across that given slice ? Formally, I would have a given, fixed longitude, and a list of vectors {latitude, radius, Value} that would show

I am new to more radical programming in R. I am trying to write a nested 'for' loop to produce output that takes subscripts like: for i taking values 1,2,3,4,5 and j taking values 1,2,3 I want to output for a computation using the combination values of i and j a value x like this; i j x 1 1 x11 1 2 x12 1 3 x13 2 1 x21 2 2 x22 2 3 x23 3 1 x31 3 2 x32

...t to the do followings: > > (1) Modify the LLVM front-end(clang) to support EFI C > > (2) Add EFI Byte Code target to LLVM > > I am wondering to know which task should I do first, modify front end or > porting LLVM? > > thanks > > yi-hong As long as EFI C isn't radically different from normal C, I would suggest adding a EBC target to LLVM first. Otherwise you have no way to test the clang modifications. - Michael Spencer

...t would just continue to do exactly what it does regarding parsing C++ expressions and converting these into types that clang understands. It will probably be useful someday to have an expression parser and language specific type system, but when that comes I don't think we'd want anything radically different than what LLDB already has. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:26 PM Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com> wrote: > Just to be clear, by "no clang integration" do you mean "no expression > parser" or do you mean something more radical? For instance, adding a > Ty...

...d to doing time-based releases, we can switch > to time-based version numbers, Year.Month, for example, if we were to > release in June it would be 16.06. We can use an extra digit for > minor releases. > This would mirror other projects doing the same, so there is precedent. Although radically different from the current model, I think it has some merit. When people report bugs with 3.1, its actually hard to estimate how it is (roughly estimating it via ~6mo release cycle does really work). This would certainly make it easier. Its a good alternative though it does mean that we no longer...

Hi @ll, a few of us had recently a discussion about how to manage the C API and possible policies regarding addition, maintenance, deprecation, and removal of API. Even thought there is a strong agreement in the community that we shouldn't break released C API and should be backwards compatible, there doesn’t seem to be a developer policy that backs that up. This is something we should fix.

As he wrote that SSH and SMTP auth and others stuffs are working, I would say SSSD should work. As he wrote there is an issue with Samba, I'd like to understand how he is using Samba, what is the exact error and what he's doing to get that error. Samba should be able to live with other tools. We should be able to able to speak here about Samba working with other tools. But that certainly