Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "racle".
Did you mean:
race
2012 Jun 09
2
[patch] NFSv4/ZFS ACLs
This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs.
The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs
without requiring a new command line option
NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is
present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new
APIs
to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and
POSIX
ACLs in
2008 Dec 15
2
rsync 3.0.4 ACL corruption
Hi,
I use rsync 3.0.4 on two opensuse 11 machines.
Every night, a big tree of machine A is synced to machine B.
These machines are samba PDC and BDC, users and groups are ldap-based,
and ACLs are heavily used. There are about 2.8 million files and dirs,
2.2 terabytes of data, and a complete ACL list produced with getfacl has
some 600 megabytes.
I've just noticed that ACLs get partially
2004 Aug 18
0
Re: m_ed,ical m'i,racle
...f a great cup,
with another rugged mountain showing on the other side of it, and soft and
pretty green hills at the ends
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeni Morgan [mailto:i@cyuwbix.com]
To: dean okeefe; roderick lanfair; glen lanius
Sent: Thursday, March, 2004 12:52 PM
Subject: med-ical m.iracle
yet our results do not point to a clinical benefit with combination therapy
With these infections further studies should assess whether the addition of
an aminoglycoside is justified
zarpar12 recalcitrante 03senegalesa tingiblediarrea
2006 Oct 03
3
change_sacl_perms() and ACLs from Solaris to 2.6 Linux
I've found an error: ACLs are not properly preserved when a file is moved
from Solaris to a 2.6 Linux (I'm testing using CentOS 4 update 3 plus
updates). This is using 2.6.8 built with the acl patch on both platforms.
The file on the source Solaris machine:
[truffle:/opt]# getfacl /xxx/x
# file: /xxx/x
# owner: root
# group: other
user::rw-
user:httpd:r-x #effective:r--
2002 Jul 15
1
*****SPAM***** Location Based Services in Oracle 9i, iSeminar- Today, 7/15 @2PM EST
...ror...
SPAM: Hit! (1.8 points) BODY: Tells you to click on a URL
SPAM:
SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
------=_Part_2566_701327617.1026758238617
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><title>Oracle Internet Sales Division : eNewsletter</title></he=
ad><body bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" link=3D"#000000" vlink=3D"#000000" alink=3D"#F=
F0000" LEFTMARGIN=3D0 TOPMARGIN=3D0><BR>
<table BORDER=3D0 CELLSPACING=3D0 CELLPADDING=3D0 WIDTH=3D"...
2006 Dec 01
1
Bug#401189: rsync: using rltvz options spews sys_acl_get_file messages
Hi,
I got the following bug report on the Debian rsync which has the ACL
patch applied:
On Fri 01 Dec 2006, Bryan Gartner wrote:
>
> When using the rltvz options to mirror files from a remote server, these
> kinds of issues are reported:
>
> default_perms_for_dir: sys_acl_get_file(wallpaper, SMB_ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT):
> Function not implemented, falling back on umask
>
2006 Dec 04
1
make errors, rsync 2.6.9 with acls patch
Hi. I'm attempting to compile rsync 2.6.9 with both the acls & xattr
patches on an MacBook pro (ie: Intel processor), with the latest
Apple Developer Tools. While this is OS X client, I've enabled acls
via "sudo /usr/bin/fsaclctl -p / -e" and rebooted, prior to
attempting to compile rsync. Is there something else inherent in OS X
Server perhaps, that I'm still