search for: ra_build

...on Mac, so you're in much better shape to catch and notice regressions. > We do have public buildbots set up for OS X: Here is one that is testing a makefile build. There are probably others in different configurations. http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/Clang/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA_build/ <http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/Clang/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA_build/> We also have a buildbot running cmake tests on OS X: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/All/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA_check/ <http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/All/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA_check/> &g...

...: clang-r219739-t2014-10-14_16-09-35-b771 FAIL: clang-r219729-t2014-10-14_15-21-29-b757 clang-r219719-t2014-10-14_14-46-50-b756: first working build clang-r219729-t2014-10-14_15-21-29-b757: next failing build Grab the most recent compiler from a build: $ llvmlab fetch "clang-stage1-configure-RA_build” downloaded root: clang-r249752-b13228.tar.gz extracted path : clang-r249752-b13228 For this initial release, I am uploading the ~18000 compilers produced on Green Dragon, which span the last 8 months of builds. As well, all new builds on Green Dragon upload their compilers right away. These are...

I just changed this build on green dragon to warn and email if warnings are found in the console log: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA_build/ > On Mar 22, 2016, at 6:24 PM, David Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > I think having -Werror bots is a good id...

Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer testing. Anna. > On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > +1 (in case you still need mine) > > On Thu, Feb 12,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think having -Werror bots is a good idea, at least when self hosting. > Non-self-hosting -Werror (i.e. with older versions of Clang, or with GCC, > etc.) might also be useful, but I'm less sure (since we can't fix those > warnings if the warning is the problem). On Tue, Mar

My thought was that its reasonable to expect no warnings when building from bootstrap (as you say) and the last release of Clang. Generally, I think we should work around warnings in the last release of Clang if only for the convenience of folks using that release to build stage1 and using Werror. Certainly, we tend to fix warnings even from earlier Clang versions and from GCC in order to keep