search for: r_x86_64_pc64

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "r_x86_64_pc64".

Did you mean: r_x86_64_64
2015 May 22
2
[LLVMdev] Sporadic "RealOffset <= INT32_MAX && RealOffset >= INT32_MIN" failures with MCJIT on Windows
...ut half the crashes with the large code model. The rest are crashing in the same way. It could either mean that large code model still takes that crashing codepath and that the number of crashes only went down by chance, or that in one place in the flow, large code model is not matched to mean ELF::R_X86_64_PC64. I'm digging into this issue further, but any hints along the way would be appreciated. Thanks. Ram On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > That sounds like a PC-relative relocation failure. Usually this happens > when the relocation target i...
2015 May 22
2
[LLVMdev] Sporadic "RealOffset <= INT32_MAX && RealOffset >= INT32_MIN" failures with MCJIT on Windows
...ode >> model. The rest are crashing in the same way. It could either mean that >> large code model still takes that crashing codepath and that the number of >> crashes only went down by chance, or that in one place in the flow, large >> code model is not matched to mean ELF::R_X86_64_PC64. I'm digging into this >> issue further, but any hints along the way would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Ram >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >> >>> That sounds like a PC-relativ...
2015 May 23
2
[LLVMdev] Sporadic "RealOffset <= INT32_MAX && RealOffset >= INT32_MIN" failures with MCJIT on Windows
...model. The rest are crashing in the same way. It could either mean that >>> large code model still takes that crashing codepath and that the number of >>> crashes only went down by chance, or that in one place in the flow, large >>> code model is not matched to mean ELF::R_X86_64_PC64. I'm digging into this >>> issue further, but any hints along the way would be appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Ram >>> >>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>> >>...
2015 May 19
3
[LLVMdev] Sporadic "RealOffset <= INT32_MAX && RealOffset >= INT32_MIN" failures with MCJIT on Windows
Hi, We are seeing sporadic crashes since we migrated to MCJIT on Win64. The same tests pass without issues on Mac64 and Linux64. The issue is this assertion failure in RuntimeDyldELF.c: RealOffset <= INT32_MAX && RealOffset >= INT32_MIN I haven't managed to successfully catch the failure in Visual to try and debug it. Any tips on how to make progress? Oh, and we're on
2015 Jan 26
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm] r188726 - Adding PIC support for ELF on x86_64 platforms
...+ } case ELF::R_X86_64_PC32: { // Get the placeholder value from the generated object since // a previous relocation attempt may have overwritten the loaded version @@ -240,6 +256,16 @@ void RuntimeDyldELF::resolveX86_64Reloca *Target = TruncOffset; break; } + case ELF::R_X86_64_PC64: { + // Get the placeholder value from the generated object since + // a previous relocation attempt may have overwritten the loaded version + uint64_t *Placeholder = reinterpret_cast<uint64_t*>(Section.ObjAddress + +...