search for: r_webassembly_function_index_leb

...t;> BTW, is that summarized somewhere? >> >> I remember the discussion about having relocations that would resolve to >> function numbers, but I don't remember where that failed. >> > > Looking at Sam's patch, it seems like that's what it does, e.g. > R_WEBASSEMBLY_FUNCTION_INDEX_LEB Sorry, I meant why that didn't work with ELF (or what else didn't). Cheers, Rafael

Sam Clegg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> Can you elaborate on semantically what the linker is actually doing for >> wasm? > > You are correct that the wasm linker does have more work to do than a > traditional linker. There are more sections that the linker will need > to re-construct fully. This is because there is more high level >