Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r_sitelib".
Did you mean:
dsitelib
2020 May 14
2
R 4.0.0
....13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote:
> Mmmh... but then you have to change that in the packages' SPEC and
> rebuild them anyway when you update R. So... what's the advantage of
> this?
We already have other examples of how to do this with less steps. :-)
Create macros like
%{r_sitearch}
%{r_sitelib}
that expand with the R version being used and place them in R-rpm-macros and
change all the R srpms to use them. We can also contribute changes to srpm
generators like https://pagure.io/r2spec.
This is a one-time change.
Then when a new R version shows up it is enough to bump the release and...
2020 May 14
0
R 4.0.0
...t then you have to change that in the packages' SPEC and
> > rebuild them anyway when you update R. So... what's the advantage of
> > this?
>
> We already have other examples of how to do this with less steps. :-)
>
> Create macros like
>
> %{r_sitearch}
> %{r_sitelib}
>
> that expand with the R version being used and place them in R-rpm-macros and
> change all the R srpms to use them. We can also contribute changes to srpm
> generators like https://pagure.io/r2spec.
>
> This is a one-time change.
>
> Then when a new R version shows up it...
2020 May 14
2
R 4.0.0
On Monday, 11 May 2020 16.47.55 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote:
> AFAIK, there's this commitment only for patch versions. In fact, the
> path for the personal library is:
>
> ~/R/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-library/<major>.<minor>/
>
> so, when you install a new minor version, you don't have any package
> in your personal library. Most of the time, for many packages,