search for: r_protect

...he precious list (via a call to R_PreserveObject without ReleaseObject being called) 2. I have another C function called cfunc2. In cfunc2, I call R_ReleaseObject on S. S , however, is still protected from the GC, because it is associated with 'v' Is (1) and (2) correct? I have not used R_protect/unprotect, because if I return from cfunc without the equivalent number of unprotects, i get 'unbalanced stack' warnings. I'd rather not have to worry about that because i intend to balance it later. Regards Saptarshi [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...he precious list (via a call to R_PreserveObject without ReleaseObject being called) 2. I have another C function called cfunc2. In cfunc2, I call R_ReleaseObject on S. S , however, is still protected from the GC, because it is associated with 'v' Is (1) and (2) correct? I have not used R_protect/unprotect, because if I return from cfunc without the equivalent number of unprotects, i get 'unbalanced stack' warnings. I'd rather not have to worry about that because i intend to balance it later. Regards Saptarshi There was a follow up in a subsequent email Hello, However, I do...

...he precious list (via a call to R_PreserveObject without ReleaseObject being called) 2. I have another C function called cfunc2. In cfunc2, I call R_ReleaseObject on S. S , however, is still protected from the GC, because it is associated with 'v' Is (1) and (2) correct? I have not used R_protect/unprotect, because if I return from cfunc without the equivalent number of unprotects, i get 'unbalanced stack' warnings. I'd rather not have to worry about that because i intend to balance it later. Regards Saptarshi There was a follow up in a subsequent email Hello, However, I do...