Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r_indr".
Did you mean:
n_indr
2013 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Alias should not point to declarations
Hi Rafael,
> With all that in mind, the attached patch changes the verifier to
> reject aliases to declarations and updates that language reference.
MachO has an R_INDR (== "indirect") symbol flag/type that (from my
understanding) exactly reflects this. The linker is supposed to record
the alias and define both symbols when the referee is defined. In
fact, I've been working on exposing this to C code very recently so
I'd obviously quite like it t...
2013 Oct 30
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Alias should not point to declarations
A long time ago (before r97733) we used to model the weakref attribute
by outputting a new declaration and a weak alias to it. This was
fairly buggy and we now implement weakref directly in clang, with the
same logic an assembler uses to implement .weakref (which is what gcc
prints).
One thing that was left from that old implementation is that we still
have alias to declarations and they are a
2013 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Alias should not point to declarations
On 30 October 2013 16:16, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
>> With all that in mind, the attached patch changes the verifier to
>> reject aliases to declarations and updates that language reference.
>
> MachO has an R_INDR (== "indirect") symbol flag/type that (from my
> understanding) exactly reflects this. The linker is supposed to record
> the alias and define both symbols when the referee is defined. In
> fact, I've been working on exposing this to C code very recently so
> I'd obvio...